From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] gpiolib / ACPI: move
 acpi_gpiochip_free_interrupts next to the request function
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 13:43:48 +0300
Message-ID: <20131014104348.GF3521@intel.com>
References: <1381392071-21407-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
 <1381392071-21407-2-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
 <CACRpkdZgP9VnVSpBN2Wg4ihL4ryZXeP=ASwr6BCP=u79eg6s6g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAAVeFu+K6HvQTMOQqMbZPUD_C3nQ1MvYju1BGUOWPYJjQEpTjg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACRpkdaVyLwOC-b2mKDRAfCQPzFZKEAm8OZxvHtbpc1koeUz-w@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdaVyLwOC-b2mKDRAfCQPzFZKEAm8OZxvHtbpc1koeUz-w@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>, "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>, Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>, Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>, Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>, ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 08:58:05AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:00 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
> >> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Mika Westerberg
> >> <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> It makes more sense to have these functions close to each other. No
> >>> functional changes.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
> >>> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> >>
> >> So I've applied this first patch, and I'm just waiting for Alexandre's
> >> ACK on the remaining patches concerning gpiod so we get this
> >> 100% right.
> >
> > I think I'm ok with Mika's patches, however I need to send you a new
> > version of gpiod. I wanted to finish documentation first, but maybe
> > that can come slightly after so you can at least go ahead with both
> > series?
> 
> The important thing right now is to get it in a testable form I think?
> So that I can throw it at the autobuilder and it gets included into
> linux-next as that comes back online.
> 
> So give me whatever you have ... BTW is this series dependent on
> yours to go in first? Sorry for not seeing the details here...

Correct, this series depends on Alexandre's patches.