From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: Extended H/W error log driver Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 12:55:33 +0200 Message-ID: <20131014105533.GF4009@pd.tnic> References: <1381473166-29303-1-git-send-email-gong.chen@linux.intel.com> <20131011080427.GC18719@pd.tnic> <20131014064940.GD12189@gchen.bj.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:58129 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756019Ab3JNKzp (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Oct 2013 06:55:45 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131014064940.GD12189@gchen.bj.intel.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Chen Gong Cc: tony.luck@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 02:49:40AM -0400, Chen Gong wrote: > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 10:04:27AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > > [56005.786154] {4}Hardware error detected on CPU0 > > > [56005.786159] {4}event severity: corrected > > > [56005.786162] {4}sub_event[0], severity: corrected > > > > This sub_event[0] could use better decoding though. > > > What's your suggestion? Well, if this only enumerates the sections in CPER, then we can simply drop it. Btw, I was wondering, why are we dropping cper_estatus_section_flag_strs? This is again the same issue with changing output which people might already rely upon. Thanks. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. --