From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] ACPI, APEI, CPER: Cleanup CPER memory error output format Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 12:13:49 +0200 Message-ID: <20131015101349.GB7908@pd.tnic> References: <1381473166-29303-1-git-send-email-gong.chen@linux.intel.com> <1381473166-29303-8-git-send-email-gong.chen@linux.intel.com> <20131011160208.GL5925@pd.tnic> <20131014045500.GC12189@gchen.bj.intel.com> <20131014103616.GE4009@pd.tnic> <20131014184717.GK4009@pd.tnic> <20131014215047.GL4009@pd.tnic> <20131015091835.GA21097@gchen.bj.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:51108 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753362Ab3JOKOD (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Oct 2013 06:14:03 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131015091835.GA21097@gchen.bj.intel.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Chen Gong Cc: Tony Luck , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-acpi , Lance Ortiz , "Naveen N. Rao" On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 05:18:35AM -0400, Chen Gong wrote: > Looks fine to me. But a little bit out of current patch series. How > about adding such interfaces after this patch series is merged? Ok. > And from your words, it looks like you prefer to reserve all current > fields to avoid breaking user space things. IOW, drop patch [7/8] Well, I was simply wondering whether something is using those. And since we don't know, apparently, we probably should keep them for now. > and use another patch with above idea to get the same purpose. This > is what you want, Boris? Yeah, let's not break userspace. :-) Thanks. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. --