From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ACPI, APEI: Cleanup alignment related codes for APEI Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 12:48:03 +0100 Message-ID: <20131116114803.GG18306@pd.tnic> References: <20131114122956.GE13376@pd.tnic> <1384494356-4034-1-git-send-email-gong.chen@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:42332 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750942Ab3KPLsd (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Nov 2013 06:48:33 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1384494356-4034-1-git-send-email-gong.chen@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Chen, Gong" Cc: tony.luck@intel.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 12:45:56AM -0500, Chen, Gong wrote: > We ever used *memcpy* to avoid access alignment issue between > firmware and OS. Now we can use a better and standard way > to avoid this issue. In the meanwhile, simplify some variable names > to avoid the limit of 80 characters per line and use structure > assignment instead of unnecessary memcpy. No functional changes. > > v3->v2: Fix an evaluation error. > v2->v1: Make description information clearer. > > Signed-off-by: Chen, Gong Acked-by: Borislav Petkov -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. --