From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
Rhyland Klein <rklein@nvidia.com>,
Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>,
Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] mmc: sdhci-acpi: covert to use GPIO descriptor API
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 12:18:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131122101803.GG2281@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <528F1B7E.7010601@intel.com>
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 10:53:18AM +0200, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 21/11/13 16:45, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > The new descriptor based GPIO interface is now the recommend and more safer
>
> "recommend and more safer" -> "recommended and safer"
OK.
>
> > way of using GPIOs from device drivers. Convert the ACPI SDHCI driver to
> > use that interface.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c | 26 ++++++++++----------------
> > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c
> > index ef19874fcd1f..379ddfe14bc7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c
> > @@ -31,10 +31,9 @@
> > #include <linux/bitops.h>
> > #include <linux/types.h>
> > #include <linux/err.h>
> > -#include <linux/gpio.h>
> > +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> > #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > #include <linux/acpi.h>
> > -#include <linux/acpi_gpio.h>
> > #include <linux/pm.h>
> > #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> > #include <linux/delay.h>
> > @@ -199,22 +198,19 @@ static irqreturn_t sdhci_acpi_sd_cd(int irq, void *dev_id)
> > return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > }
> >
> > -static int sdhci_acpi_add_own_cd(struct device *dev, int gpio,
> > - struct mmc_host *mmc)
> > +static int sdhci_acpi_add_own_cd(struct device *dev, struct mmc_host *mmc)
> > {
> > + struct gpio_desc *desc;
> > unsigned long flags;
> > int err, irq;
> >
> > - if (gpio < 0) {
> > - err = gpio;
> > + desc = devm_gpiod_get_index(dev, NULL, 0);
>
> I notice that:
>
> devm_gpio_request_one(.., label)
> -> gpio_request_one(..., label)
> -> gpiod_request(..., label)
>
> but:
>
> devm_gpiod_get_index(..., con_id, ...)
> -> gpiod_get_index(..., con_id, ...)
> -> gpiod_request(..., con_id)
>
> which suggests that 'con_id' is equivalent to 'label'.
> i.e. "sd_cd". Is it?
Indeed, it is. Even though ACPI doesn't use con_id for lookup gpiolib uses
it as a label once the GPIO descriptor is found.
I'll change that from NULL to "sd_cd".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-22 10:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-21 14:45 [PATCH 0/5] gpio / ACPI: convert users to gpiod_* and drop acpi_gpio.h Mika Westerberg
2013-11-21 14:45 ` [PATCH 1/5] net: rfkill: gpio: convert to descriptor-based GPIO interface Mika Westerberg
2013-11-21 15:24 ` Heikki Krogerus
2013-11-21 17:05 ` Rhyland Klein
2013-11-21 17:22 ` Mika Westerberg
2013-11-21 21:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-11-21 15:32 ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-11-22 10:50 ` Heikki Krogerus
2013-11-21 14:45 ` [PATCH 2/5] mmc: sdhci-acpi: covert to use GPIO descriptor API Mika Westerberg
2013-11-22 8:53 ` Adrian Hunter
2013-11-22 10:18 ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
2013-11-21 14:45 ` [PATCH 3/5] gpio / ACPI: register to ACPI events automatically Mika Westerberg
2013-11-21 14:45 ` [PATCH 4/5] gpio / ACPI: get rid of acpi_gpio.h Mika Westerberg
2013-11-21 14:45 ` [PATCH 5/5] Documentation / ACPI: update to GPIO descriptor API Mika Westerberg
2013-11-21 15:01 ` [PATCH 0/5] gpio / ACPI: convert users to gpiod_* and drop acpi_gpio.h Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131122101803.GG2281@intel.com \
--to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acourbot@nvidia.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=rklein@nvidia.com \
--cc=rob@landley.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).