From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] New Driver for IOSF-SB MBI access on Intel SOCs Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 18:18:27 +0000 Message-ID: <20131122181827.GA16998@srcf.ucam.org> References: <1385100357-5459-1-git-send-email-david.e.box@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:50664 "EHLO cavan.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753756Ab3KVSSm (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Nov 2013 13:18:42 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1385100357-5459-1-git-send-email-david.e.box@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "David E. Box" Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, rjw@sisk.pl, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:05:56PM -0800, David E. Box wrote: > + bool "IOSF-SB MailBox Interface access support for Intel SOC's" Any reason this can't be modular? > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/iosf_mbi.c b/arch/x86/kernel/iosf_mbi.c This is effectively a driver, so putting it under platform/driver/x86 might make more sense. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org