From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ACPI, APEI, GHES: Cleanup ghes codes for memory error handling Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 08:23:35 +0100 Message-ID: <20131126072335.GA20917@pd.tnic> References: <1385363701-12387-1-git-send-email-gong.chen@linux.intel.com> <1385363701-12387-2-git-send-email-gong.chen@linux.intel.com> <20131126065456.GB26098@gchen.bj.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:59607 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754193Ab3KZHXk (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Nov 2013 02:23:40 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131126065456.GB26098@gchen.bj.intel.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Chen, Gong" Cc: tony.luck@intel.com, naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 01:54:57AM -0500, Chen, Gong wrote: > In this patch so-called cleanup includes an implied PFN check for UC > error but missed in current codes. Right, I was about to look at it. You probably should add this to the commit message so that it is clear. Thanks. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. --