From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 2/2] ACPI/platform: Add ACPI ID for Intel MBI device Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 01:30:01 +0000 Message-ID: <20131204013001.GA25037@srcf.ucam.org> References: <1385100357-5459-1-git-send-email-david.e.box@linux.intel.com> <1386115178-7559-1-git-send-email-david.e.box@linux.intel.com> <1386115178-7559-3-git-send-email-david.e.box@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:40969 "EHLO cavan.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753409Ab3LDBaG (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Dec 2013 20:30:06 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1386115178-7559-3-git-send-email-david.e.box@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "David E. Box" Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 03:59:38PM -0800, David E. Box wrote: > From: "David E. Box" > > Adds ACPI ID for Intel IOSF-SB MailBox device found in BayTrail platforms. Little bit confused here. This is a new driver and only declares modaliases for the ACPI IDs - why does it need to be added here? -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org