From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>,
Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org>,
Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@arm.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
"linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"patches@linaro.org" <patches@linaro.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
"linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"rob.herring@calxeda.com" <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [Linaro-acpi] [RFC part1 PATCH 1/7] ACPI: Make ACPI core running without PCI on ARM64
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 18:01:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131209180155.GG19163@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201312091820.23006.arnd@arndb.de>
On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 05:20:22PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 09 December 2013, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > CONFIG_PCI does not exist on arm64 yet (we have some internal patches
> > but may not be ready to be posted before the holidays; they try to share
> > code with other archs, so more discussions before merging). We could add
> > CONFIG_PCI and some dummy functions on arm64 for development (not to be
> > upstreamed) or Hanjun could continue to use the current patch before we
> > get PCI working. In the order of priorities, we'll have to merge PCI
> > before ACPI anyway.
>
> Well, lack of PCI support on ARM64 is a much better reason for accepting
> the patch than potential use on non-server platforms of course.
As I said above about priorities, we are not in a hurry to merge ACPI
for arm64 before PCI is supported.
> What is the status of the PCI work though? I suspect it won't be all
> that hard to add minimal PCI support for a simple mmconfig plus
> fixed I/O space based host of the kind that qemu can easily provide.
Liviu (ARM engineer) has been working on generalising the microblaze
code (which is very similar to powerpc) and enable it on arm64. The
patches will be posted soon (though may slip into the new year) but
there will be many discussions on how to do this best, so I don't expect
a quick merge.
In parallel, Will is looking at getting PCI to work with kvmtool and
that's something we could merge sooner (but again, in the new year).
> The hard part that we want to share code with other architectures is
> supporting pluggable host controllers, and I think we can defer that
> a bit.
Indeed, this would take time.
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-09 18:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-03 16:36 [RFC part1 PATCH 0/7] Make ACPI core running on ARM64 Hanjun Guo
2013-12-03 16:36 ` [RFC part1 PATCH 1/7] ACPI: Make ACPI core running without PCI " Hanjun Guo
2013-12-03 16:41 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-12-04 14:08 ` Hanjun Guo
2013-12-05 22:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-12-06 15:04 ` [Linaro-acpi] " Tomasz Nowicki
2013-12-06 17:23 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-12-09 4:12 ` Hanjun Guo
2013-12-09 11:50 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-12-09 13:05 ` Hanjun Guo
2013-12-09 16:35 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-12-09 16:55 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-12-09 17:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-12-09 18:01 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2013-12-16 20:51 ` Graeme Gregory
2013-12-17 11:29 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-12-19 11:30 ` Graeme Gregory
2013-12-19 14:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-12-19 15:43 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-12-20 19:55 ` Mark Brown
2013-12-10 2:53 ` Hanjun Guo
2013-12-09 17:06 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-12-10 1:52 ` Hanjun Guo
2013-12-10 3:28 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-12-10 19:22 ` Mark Brown
2013-12-10 20:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-12-10 20:23 ` Mark Brown
2013-12-11 3:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-12-11 11:02 ` Mark Brown
2013-12-10 9:56 ` Linus Walleij
2013-12-09 23:34 ` Rob Herring
2013-12-03 16:47 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2013-12-04 14:15 ` Hanjun Guo
2013-12-03 16:36 ` [RFC part1 PATCH 2/7] ARM64 : Add dummy asm/cpu.h Hanjun Guo
2013-12-03 17:13 ` Mark Rutland
2013-12-04 15:00 ` Hanjun Guo
2013-12-03 17:59 ` Mark Brown
2013-12-03 16:36 ` [RFC part1 PATCH 3/7] ACPI / processor_core: Rework _PDC related stuff to make it more arch-independent Hanjun Guo
2013-12-03 16:46 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-12-04 14:11 ` Hanjun Guo
2013-12-03 16:51 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2013-12-03 17:02 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-12-04 14:16 ` Hanjun Guo
2013-12-03 16:36 ` [RFC part1 PATCH 4/7] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce the skeleton of _PDC related for ARM64 Hanjun Guo
2013-12-03 16:53 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2013-12-04 14:17 ` Hanjun Guo
2013-12-03 17:12 ` Rob Herring
2013-12-04 14:30 ` Hanjun Guo
2013-12-03 16:36 ` [RFC part1 PATCH 5/7] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce arm_core.c and its related head file Hanjun Guo
2013-12-03 18:03 ` Mark Rutland
2013-12-04 15:48 ` Hanjun Guo
2013-12-04 5:46 ` Zheng, Lv
2013-12-04 15:53 ` Hanjun Guo
2013-12-04 19:47 ` Al Stone
2013-12-05 3:38 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-12-05 13:51 ` Hanjun Guo
2013-12-05 20:40 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-12-05 14:09 ` Rob Herring
2013-12-05 14:27 ` Hanjun Guo
2013-12-03 16:36 ` [RFC part1 PATCH 6/7] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce lowlevel suspend function Hanjun Guo
2013-12-03 16:36 ` [RFC part1 PATCH 7/7] ARM64 / ACPI: Enable ARM64 in Kconfig Hanjun Guo
2013-12-04 10:10 ` Graeme Gregory
2013-12-04 15:55 ` Hanjun Guo
2013-12-05 22:25 ` [RFC part1 PATCH 0/7] Make ACPI core running on ARM64 Arnd Bergmann
2013-12-06 13:58 ` Mark Brown
2013-12-08 2:44 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-12-08 19:40 ` Mark Brown
2013-12-10 9:45 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131209180155.GG19163@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=Mark.Rutland@arm.com \
--cc=Will.Deacon@arm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
--cc=tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).