From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
To: "Zheng, Lv" <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Cc: "Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>, Lv Zheng <zetalog@gmail.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, "Tang, Feng" <feng.tang@intel.com>,
"sfi-devel@simplefirmware.org" <sfi-devel@simplefirmware.org>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] ACPI/SFI: Fix wrong <acpi/acpi.h> inclusion in SFI/ACPI wrapper - acpi_disabled linkage.
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 16:15:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131209231515.GA4699@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1AE640813FDE7649BE1B193DEA596E88024950DB@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 02:53:00PM +0000, Zheng, Lv wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > From: Zheng, Lv
> > Sent: Friday, December 06, 2013 4:52 PM
> > To: Wysocki, Rafael J; Brown, Len
> >
> > In Linux kernel, ACPICA is wrapped and safely exported by CONFIG_ACPI. So
> > all external modules should depend on CONFIG_ACPI rather than using ACPICA
> > header directly for stubbing. But if we moves <acpi/acpi.h> inclusions
> > into "#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI", build breakge can help to detect wrong ACPICA
> > dependent modules.
> >
> > One of the build breakage is:
> > arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c:389:1: error: unknown type name 'acpi_status'
> > arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c:389:47: warning: 'struct acpi_resource' declared inside parameter list [enabled by default]
> > arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c:389:47: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want
> > [enabled by default]
> > arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c: In function 'check_mcfg_resource':
> > arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c:392:33: error: storage size of 'address' isn't known
> > arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c:393:2: error: unknown type name 'acpi_status'
> > arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c:395:9: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
> > arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c:395:19: error: 'ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_FIXED_MEMORY32' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c:395:19: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> > arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c:397:8: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
> > arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c:399:11: error: 'AE_OK' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c:400:35: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
> > arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c:401:33: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
> > arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c:402:19: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
> > arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c:404:11: error: 'AE_CTRL_TERMINATE' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c:407:10: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
> > arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c:407:20: error: 'ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_ADDRESS32' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c:408:10: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
> > arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c:408:20: error: 'ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_ADDRESS64' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c:411:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'acpi_resource_to_address64' [-Werror=implicit-
> > function-declaration]
> > arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c:412:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'ACPI_FAILURE' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c:414:31: error: 'ACPI_MEMORY_RANGE' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c:392:33: warning: unused variable 'address' [-Wunused-variable]
> > arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c: At top level:
> > arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c:425:1: error: unknown type name 'acpi_status'
> > arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c:425:41: error: unknown type name 'acpi_handle'
> > arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c: In function 'is_acpi_reserved':
> > arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c:447:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'acpi_get_devices' [-Werror=implicit-function-
> > declaration]
> > arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c:447:30: error: 'find_mboard_resource' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c: At top level:
> > arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c:389:20: warning: 'check_mcfg_resource' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>
> Let me say something about this error messages. Someone may face difficulties to reproduce it.
> Currently, this message cannot be seen in any kernel build.
> This is because this patch series doesn't include a fix to remove <acpi/acpi.h> inclusion from linux/sfi_acpi.h.
> To achieve this, I have offered 2 options:
> 1. Redefining ACPICA table stuff for CONFIG_ACPI=n environment, or
> 2. Implementing stubs for all ACPICA functions/globals/macros and introducing <linux/acpica.h> (where acpi/acpi.h is included) as a top level header.
> 3. Other solutions...
>
> If we choose solution 1, then this issue is exposed by a build test where CONFIG_ACPI=n and CONFIG_SFI=y.
> Since we haven't decided what to do for the table structures and it is really not a good approach to achieve the build safety for mmconfig-share.c by relying on link-stage optimization rather than compile-stage referencing. IMO, we need to sort it out, thus I make it a part of this patchset.
>
> Well, if we choose solution 2, this patch can only help to reduce the size of the kernel image.
OK, I assume you will make sure one of these fixes gets merged before the
change that causes the breakage, so bisection continues to work.
Therefore, I think it's best if both changes are merged through the same
tree, and I won't apply this via the PCI tree. Let me know if you need me
to do something.
Bjorn
> >
> > The root cause of this breakage is:
> > 1. The following commit doesn't protect ACPICA functions like
> > acpi_get_devices()/acpi_walk_resources()/acpi_resource_to_address64() in
> > CONFIG_SFI=y and CONFIG_ACPI=n environment:
> > Commit: 5f0db7a2fb78895a197f64e548333b3bbd433996
> > Author: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
> > Subject: SFI: Hook PCI MMCONFIG
> > First check ACPI, and if that fails, ask SFI to find the MCFG.
> > So it actually depends on the logic that in !CONFIG_ACPI builds, code
> > blocks under "if (!acpi_disabled)" will not be linked in.
> >
> > This patch fixes this issue by introducing a stub for MCFG entry checker
> > is_acpi_reserved() in !CONFIG_ACPI builds.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
> > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> > Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
> > Cc: sfi-devel@simplefirmware.org
> > Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
> > ---
> > arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c | 7 +++++++
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c b/arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c
> > index 248642f..2c04b22 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/pci/mmconfig-shared.c
> > @@ -369,6 +369,7 @@ static int __init pci_mmcfg_check_hostbridge(void)
> > return !list_empty(&pci_mmcfg_list);
> > }
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> > static acpi_status check_mcfg_resource(struct acpi_resource *res, void *data)
> > {
> > struct resource *mcfg_res = data;
> > @@ -435,6 +436,12 @@ static int is_acpi_reserved(u64 start, u64 end, unsigned not_used)
> >
> > return mcfg_res.flags;
> > }
> > +#else
> > +static inline int is_acpi_reserved(u64 start, u64 end, unsigned not_used)
> > +{
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +#endif
> >
> > typedef int (*check_reserved_t)(u64 start, u64 end, unsigned type);
> >
> > --
> > 1.7.10
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-09 23:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-22 23:26 [PATCH 0/4] ACPI: Cleanup header inclusions Lv Zheng
2013-11-22 23:27 ` [PATCH 1/4] ACPICA: Linux: Cleanup wrong ACPICA inclusions Lv Zheng
2013-11-25 23:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-11-22 23:29 ` [PATCH 2/4] ACPI: Cleanup <acpi/acpi_bus.h> and <acpi/acpi_drivers.h> inclusions Lv Zheng
2013-11-26 0:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-11-26 0:29 ` Zheng, Lv
2013-11-22 23:32 ` [PATCH 3/4] ACPICA: Cleanup <acpi/acpi.h> inclusions Lv Zheng
2013-11-22 23:37 ` [PATCH 4/4] ACPI: Add support to force header inclusion rules for <linux/acpi.h> Lv Zheng
2013-11-26 0:09 ` [UPDATE PATCH " Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-11-26 0:32 ` Zheng, Lv
2013-11-26 5:21 ` [PATCH v2] ACPI: Cleanup <acpi/acpi.h>, <acpi/acpi_bus.h> and <acpi/acpi_drivers.h> inclusions Lv Zheng
2013-11-26 20:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-11-26 20:27 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-11-26 20:29 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-11-27 0:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-11-28 1:12 ` Zheng, Lv
2013-11-28 2:34 ` Zheng, Lv
2013-11-26 20:54 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-11-28 0:54 ` Zheng, Lv
2013-11-28 14:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-12-03 23:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-12-04 3:31 ` Zheng, Lv
2013-11-26 21:07 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-12-04 0:41 ` [UPDTE PATCH 0/3] ACPI: Cleanup direct ACPICA inclusions Lv Zheng
2013-12-04 0:38 ` [PATCH 1/3] ACPI/i915: Fix wrong <acpi/acpi.h> inclusion in i915 opregion module Lv Zheng
2013-12-04 8:16 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2013-12-05 13:04 ` Jani Nikula
2013-12-04 0:38 ` [PATCH 2/3] ACPI/SFI: Fix wrong <acpi/acpi.h> inclusion in SFI/ACPI wrapper - acpi_disabled linkage Lv Zheng
2013-12-04 0:38 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] ACPI/IBFT: Fix wrong <acpi/acpi.h> inclusion in iSCSI boot firmware module Lv Zheng
2013-12-05 14:25 ` [PATCH v2] ACPI/i915: Fix wrong <acpi/acpi.h> inclusion in i915 opregion module Lv Zheng
2013-12-06 8:51 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] ACPI: Cleanup header inclusions Lv Zheng
2013-12-06 8:51 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] ACPI: Clean up incorrect inclusions of ACPICA headers Lv Zheng
2013-12-06 8:51 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] ACPI: Clean up inclusions of ACPI header files Lv Zheng
2013-12-06 14:31 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-12-06 8:51 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] SFI: Fix warnings reported by W=1 builds Lv Zheng
2013-12-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] ACPI/i915: Fix wrong <acpi/acpi.h> inclusion in i915 opregion module Lv Zheng
2013-12-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] ACPI/SFI: Fix wrong <acpi/acpi.h> inclusion in SFI/ACPI wrapper - acpi_disabled linkage Lv Zheng
2013-12-06 14:53 ` Zheng, Lv
2013-12-09 23:15 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2013-12-12 1:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-12-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] ACPI/IBFT: Fix wrong <acpi/acpi.h> inclusion in iSCSI boot firmware module Lv Zheng
2013-12-06 15:01 ` Zheng, Lv
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131209231515.GA4699@google.com \
--to=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lv.zheng@intel.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=sfi-devel@simplefirmware.org \
--cc=zetalog@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).