From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ACPI, APEI: Cleanup alignment related codes for APEI Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 18:55:51 +0100 Message-ID: <20131216175551.GD9683@pd.tnic> References: <20131114122956.GE13376@pd.tnic> <1384494356-4034-1-git-send-email-gong.chen@linux.intel.com> <20131216141906.GC4922@pd.tnic> <20131216143934.GB8397@gchen.bj.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:51439 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754565Ab3LPRzy (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Dec 2013 12:55:54 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131216143934.GB8397@gchen.bj.intel.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: tony.luck@intel.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, "Chen, Gong" On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 09:39:34AM -0500, Chen, Gong wrote: > erst record id cache is implemented in the memory to increase the > access speed via caching ERST content, so it doesn't matter with > firmware access. So what's with the memcpy in __erst_record_id_cache_add_one()? -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. --