From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Aaron Lu Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI / video: Use native backlight control interface by default Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 14:32:21 +0800 Message-ID: <20131220063219.GA6158@aaronlu.linux.com> References: <1386209037-31349-1-git-send-email-acelan.kao@canonical.com> <20131205023237.GA23671@srcf.ucam.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-pd0-f181.google.com ([209.85.192.181]:57837 "EHLO mail-pd0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751904Ab3LTGcY (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Dec 2013 01:32:24 -0500 Received: by mail-pd0-f181.google.com with SMTP id p10so2120704pdj.40 for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 22:32:24 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Daniel Vetter Cc: Matthew Garrett , AceLan Kao , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Zhang Rui , Len Brown , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , intel-gfx On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 08:50:21AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:32 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > We had problems with the Intel backlight driver the last time we tried > > this, so let's push this through their tree for testing first? Cc:ed > > intel-gfx and Daniel Vetter. > > Makes sense imo. Or if I just get a branch with just those patches (it > can rebase, I don't really care) I could pull it into our > drm-intel-nightly integration tree, which is what everyone is testing > anyway. Only this patch is needed, all other patches have been in Linus' tree since v3.13-rc1.