From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] ACPI: HW reduced mode does not allow use of the FADT sci_interrupt field Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 04:56:30 +0000 Message-ID: <20131227045630.GA21429@srcf.ucam.org> References: <1387239401-13918-1-git-send-email-al.stone@linaro.org> <1387239401-13918-4-git-send-email-al.stone@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:44954 "EHLO cavan.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752223Ab3L0E4g (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Dec 2013 23:56:36 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1387239401-13918-4-git-send-email-al.stone@linaro.org> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: al.stone@linaro.org Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, patches@linaro.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 05:16:39PM -0700, al.stone@linaro.org wrote: > + if (!acpi_gbl_reduced_hardware) { I don't really understand this. You've explained that runtime hardware reduced mode switching isn't expected to work, but you're making this conditional on a runtime flag? -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org