public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: Flag use of ACPI and ACPI idioms for power supplies to regulator API
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 10:43:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140127104350.GV11727@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140127092509.24844e25@endymion.delvare>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 610 bytes --]

On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 09:25:09AM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 00:32:14 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:

> > control at all. This means that if for some reason the regulator API is
> > enabled on such a system it should assume that any supplies that devices
> > need are provided by the system at all relevant times without any software
> > intervention.

> > Tell the regulator core to make this assumption by calling
> > regulator_has_full_constraints(). Do this as soon as we know we are using

> I think it makes sense to have this included in stable kernel trees?

Yes, that should be safe.

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-27 10:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-27  0:32 [PATCH] ACPI: Flag use of ACPI and ACPI idioms for power supplies to regulator API Mark Brown
2014-01-27  0:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-01-27  0:44   ` Mark Brown
2014-01-27 12:54     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-01-27 13:21       ` Mark Brown
2014-01-28  0:06         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-01-28 12:21           ` Mark Brown
2014-01-28 21:55             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-01-27  8:25 ` Jean Delvare
2014-01-27 10:43   ` Mark Brown [this message]
2014-01-27 14:58 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-01-27 16:25   ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140127104350.GV11727@sirena.org.uk \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox