From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mika Westerberg Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "ACPI / video: Add HP EliteBook Revolve 810 to the blacklist" Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 17:26:01 +0200 Message-ID: <20140214152601.GL5018@intel.com> References: <1392381247-28109-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> <20140214140316.GI5018@intel.com> <20140214141652.GJ5018@intel.com> <20140214144524.GK5018@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:29987 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751880AbaBNPS1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Feb 2014 10:18:27 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Takashi Iwai Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , Aaron Lu , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 03:46:20PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > The acpi_osi blacklist is just a workaround, and if we have better > solutions, it should be removed. That's why I'm asking it. > > So, after removing acpi_osi blacklist, and keeping your video > blacklist patch, the backlight works? Yes, the backlight works (there is only intel_backlight listed under /sys/class/backlight). > If yes, as mentioned, we should think of rather extending this video > blacklist to more EliteBook G1 and ProBook G1 machines, and remove > acpi_osi blacklist instead. Makes sense to me. (Well, I'm fine as long as backlight on my machine works ;-)) Aaron, Rafael, any comments on this?