From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mika Westerberg Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] gpio / ACPI: Embed events list directly into struct acpi_gpio_chip Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 11:10:01 +0200 Message-ID: <20140226091001.GW5018@intel.com> References: <1393257611-18031-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> <1393257611-18031-5-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> <46469934.18k5deNECp@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:17154 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751175AbaBZJCh (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Feb 2014 04:02:37 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46469934.18k5deNECp@vostro.rjw.lan> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Linus Walleij , Alexandre Courbot , Lan Tianyu , Lv Zheng , Alan Cox , Mathias Nyman , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 03:26:12PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, February 24, 2014 06:00:09 PM Mika Westerberg wrote: > > It is not necessary to have events as a pointer to list in struct > > acpi_gpio_chip. Instead we can embed the list_head directly to struct > > acpi_gpio_chip itself. This makes event handling a bit simpler because now > > we don't need to check whether the pointer is NULL or not. > > It looks like I should have reviewed the whole series before commenting [2/6]. > > Well, my modified comment would be "Why don't you fold this one into [2/6]?", then. I will in the next version, thanks.