From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Catalin Marinas Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add maintainers for arm64 acpi Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 10:23:16 +0000 Message-ID: <20140304102316.GG30596@arm.com> References: <1393899345-7397-1-git-send-email-graeme.gregory@linaro.org> <1393899345-7397-2-git-send-email-graeme.gregory@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1393899345-7397-2-git-send-email-graeme.gregory@linaro.org> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Graeme Gregory Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , "grant.likely@linaro.org" , Will Deacon , "lenb@kernel.org" , "rjw@rjwysocki.net" List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 02:15:45AM +0000, Graeme Gregory wrote: > +ACPI ARM64 That's a pretty broad statement for a single file. Is it core support, architected peripherals, SoC? > +M: Hanjun Guo > +M: Graeme Gregory > +S: Supported > +L: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org > +F: drivers/acpi/plat/arm-core.c This patch should be part of the series introducing the arm-core.c file and it will be ACKed (or NAKed) following review. We can't really commit maintainers to a file which does not exist in mainline and while there is still feedback to be addressed. It's like a blank cheque. -- Catalin