From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] trace, RAS: Add eMCA trace event interface Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 11:33:06 +0100 Message-ID: <20140310103306.GD14808@pd.tnic> References: <1393924997-8992-1-git-send-email-gong.chen@linux.intel.com> <1393924997-8992-3-git-send-email-gong.chen@linux.intel.com> <20140307114416.GA5255@pd.tnic> <20140310082241.GA873@gchen.bj.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:51666 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752191AbaCJKdJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Mar 2014 06:33:09 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140310082241.GA873@gchen.bj.intel.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Chen, Gong" Cc: tony.luck@intel.com, m.chehab@samsung.com, arozansk@redhat.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 04:22:42AM -0400, Chen, Gong wrote: > Do we really need to do that? IMHO, I think they are used for two > different usages, just like dmesg & mcelog. Yes, we do. We want to be able to disable issuing errors into dmesg so that people don't have to parse it. This is the main reason why we're adding tracepoints - so that we have structured error format going out of the kernel. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. --