From: "Chen, Gong" <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: tony.luck@intel.com, m.chehab@samsung.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, arozansk@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] trace, RAS: Add basic RAS trace event
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2014 23:20:58 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140414032058.GA22584@gchen.bj.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140409194654.GR6529@pd.tnic>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1086 bytes --]
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 09:46:54PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
[...]
>
> This should actually be
>
> menuconfig RAS
> bool "Reliability, Availability, Serviceability features"
> help
> <A nice text about what this is going to contain, i.e. RAS stuff
>
> ...
>
> if RAS
> config RAS_TRACE
> def_bool y
> depends on ...
>
> See drivers/edac/Kconfig for an example.
I don't use a explicit menu for RAS because I'm not sure if it is worth
to add such a *heavy hammer* in the kernel tree. Since you suggest it,
it is fine to me.
>
> RAS_TRACE should actually depend on all the code that uses it, or, it
> should be selected by them. EDAC_MM_EDAC is not accurate enough and will
> enable RAS_TRACE even for drivers which don't use the tracepoint(s).
Maybe some drivers don't call trace_mc_event directly/indirectly, but
edac_mc.c is the core of EDAC and must exist before any other drivers
are loaded, which means whether the drivers call trace_mc_event or not,
the trace interface in edac_mc should be there in advance. Do I miss
something?
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-14 3:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-28 5:52 Add new eMCA trace event interface Chen, Gong
2014-03-28 5:52 ` [PATCH 1/5] trace, RAS: Add basic RAS trace event Chen, Gong
2014-04-09 19:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-04-14 3:20 ` Chen, Gong [this message]
2014-04-14 10:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-04-16 6:33 ` Chen, Gong
2014-04-16 13:10 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-03-28 5:52 ` [PATCH 2/5] CPER: Adjust code flow of some functions Chen, Gong
2014-04-14 13:39 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-04-14 14:05 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-04-15 9:24 ` Chen, Gong
2014-04-15 18:02 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-04-16 5:01 ` Chen, Gong
2014-04-16 13:14 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-04-15 9:19 ` Chen, Gong
2014-04-15 18:05 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-04-16 6:23 ` Chen, Gong
2014-04-16 13:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-04-17 3:00 ` Chen, Gong
2014-03-28 5:52 ` [PATCH 3/5] trace, RAS: Add eMCA trace event interface Chen, Gong
2014-03-28 5:53 ` [PATCH 4/5] trace, eMCA: Add a knob to adjust where to save event log Chen, Gong
2014-04-03 23:46 ` Tony Luck
2014-04-04 8:05 ` Chen, Gong
2014-04-08 7:59 ` [PATCH 4/5 v2] " Chen, Gong
2014-03-28 5:53 ` [PATCH 5/5] trace, AER: Move trace into unified interface Chen, Gong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140414032058.GA22584@gchen.bj.intel.com \
--to=gong.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arozansk@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.chehab@samsung.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).