linux-acpi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>,
	Linux PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Zheng Z Yan <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>,
	Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>, Rui Zhang <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2] PNP: Work around BIOS defects in Intel MCH area reporting
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 09:20:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140424072021.GA3396@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABPqkBRVfajbeWeaZRmv6SSWcX7DAuGCxfmrHGiUTPkbfxVMWg@mail.gmail.com>


* Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 12:17 AM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> wrote:
> > Work around BIOSes that don't report the entire Intel MCH area.
> >
> > MCHBAR is not an architected PCI BAR, so MCH space is usually reported as a
> > PNP0C02 resource.  The MCH space was once 16KB, but is 32KB in newer parts.
> > Some BIOSes still report a PNP0C02 resource that is only 16KB, which means
> > the rest of the MCH space is consumed but unreported.
> >
> > This can cause resource map sanity check warnings or (theoretically) a
> > device conflict if we assigned the unreported space to another device.
> >
> > The Intel perf event uncore driver tripped over this when it claimed the
> > MCH region:
> >
> >   resource map sanity check conflict: 0xfed10000 0xfed15fff 0xfed10000 0xfed13fff pnp 00:01
> >   Info: mapping multiple BARs. Your kernel is fine.
> >
> > To prevent this, if we find a PNP0C02 resource that covers part of the MCH
> > space, extend it to cover the entire space.
> >
> Works for me on my Levono IvyBridge laptop.
> Thanks for fixing this, Bjorn.
> Acked-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>

Just curious, what problems triggered on your laptop: only the 
warnings, or did something get mapped to the undeclared area,
causing other misbehavor?

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-24  7:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-21 22:17 [PATCH 2] PNP: Work around BIOS defects in Intel MCH area reporting Bjorn Helgaas
2014-04-23 13:54 ` Stephane Eranian
2014-04-24  7:20   ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2014-04-24  9:41     ` Stephane Eranian

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140424072021.GA3396@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=aaron.lu@intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    --cc=zheng.z.yan@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).