[PATCH 0/3] (was: Re: PM / sleep: Mechanism to avoid resuming runtime-suspended devices unnecessarily)

Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-16T00:45:35Z

On Thursday, May 15, 2014 01:13:02 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 10:53:16 AM Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 May 2014, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

[cut]

> >
> > if (dev->power.direct_complete) {
> > if (pm_runtime_status_suspended(dev)) {
> > pm_runtime_disable(dev);
> > if (dev->power.disable_depth == 1
> > && pm_runtime_status_suspended(dev))
> > goto Complete;
> > pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> > }
> > dev->power.direct_complete = false;
> > }
>
> That is a good idea, thanks!

New patches follow.

[1/3] is the core change with the above added.

> > Also, now that we have finally settled on the appropriate API, there
> > needs to ba a patch updating the PM documentation.
>
> Absolutely. I thought about updating the documentation in the same patch
> (at least the comments in pm.h), but I guess a separate patch for files
> under Documentation/ may be better.

[2/3] is the corresponding documentation update (I hope I haven't overlooked
anything important).

[3/3] is a resend of the ACPI PM patch on top of the core change.

Rafael