From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Chen, Gong" Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7 v4] CPER: Adjust code flow of some functions Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 06:42:21 -0400 Message-ID: <20140526104221.GA20940@gchen.bj.intel.com> References: <1400142646-10127-1-git-send-email-gong.chen@linux.intel.com> <1400142646-10127-4-git-send-email-gong.chen@linux.intel.com> <20140521110521.GF21205@pd.tnic> <20140521235159.GB1644@gchen.bj.intel.com> <20140522105242.GG4383@pd.tnic> <20140523014910.GB16945@gchen.bj.intel.com> <20140523093703.GB21332@pd.tnic> <20140523101143.GC21332@pd.tnic> <20140526015944.GA31035@gchen.bj.intel.com> <20140526102151.GE25732@pd.tnic> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY" Return-path: Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:42201 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752314AbaEZLJz (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 May 2014 07:09:55 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140526102151.GE25732@pd.tnic> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Borislav Petkov Cc: tony.luck@intel.com, m.chehab@samsung.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org --OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 12:21:51PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 12:21:51 +0200 > From: Borislav Petkov > To: "Chen, Gong" > Cc: tony.luck@intel.com, m.chehab@samsung.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7 v4] CPER: Adjust code flow of some functions > User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) >=20 > On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 09:59:44PM -0400, Chen, Gong wrote: > > On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 12:11:43PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > > + TP_printk("%d %s error: %s %s %llx (mask lsb: %x), %s%s", > > What if pa_mask_lsb not existing? >=20 > Then you make it the default which says that all bits in the mask are > invalid: -1, i.e. 255. >=20 > This becomes part of the interface then, just like phys_addr is > 0xfffff... ,i.e. -1 in the invalid case. >=20 OK, fine to me. I will update it soon. --OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTgxqNAAoJEI01n1+kOSLH0KgP/itmuZnJbepFQkQF4FLIUsJZ 161zTwRMghnywihETsvMuIBJ3vcz5m4CXnOpnTYDrBO6TT77rlemB7Zr9Q5D3nkj ovkwSAY7+qewR3V0zFPJwOMb7M9MynvW+P/sYOqxH6SzC7KyHg7Z7Mor29+ZDPSl WKH5TzI99QBSsoWKPOeXW79L5rEj8OmbqqgtA36FYxaJ0Q4c/R6V2nZDANwEs7dA cP48nTGo7TbHjHeyK3vVFoWMz0NM+k+0EgGnPHFUvwD6TeDic5dNKxPPQ1eb1LdX wZlRiRv/7FX7ygvgFJMjgVHiqxngh/F8B777zM4DlZFUTJk77/YJvbgQl1Hrin7p edRMZ6Z750w5cLqn51n2tnN3KwCOQde+TAupIE/68G07zXokQ4F00hEd/JfaHI6j JjnGBgeYQDZsah7G3uyJ47T5EERDfRQgaztlzDO0LeWVdROZiXhVStPSE3zbjJbo MvcU17NXQ001p5DcuofD070fJXY2yh5Hp6W4cYMgmh3+Ro1FNotnEy5/uHS3s1Ao rq9d+0M70IenRhoVNqHeP9TrTIWey3/VdlP3iWrZx+G50yFA2uP1HzEZO1e4iAKq ZLA1NIeIlQbvMXFDvctWBIU72VG+r+7FUgOnWn8com2cm4kCOIlqK5ait0kFgoA1 EdjoDDTcgE8BTJafqtSo =zyhr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY--