From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] acpi, apei, ghes: Make NMI error notification to be GHES architecture extension. Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2014 12:37:31 +0200 Message-ID: <20140704103731.GA9246@pd.tnic> References: <1403610095-5354-1-git-send-email-tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org> <1403610095-5354-3-git-send-email-tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org> <20140702121645.GF1318@pd.tnic> <53B64F3C.6080502@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:42664 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757696AbaGDKhn (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Jul 2014 06:37:43 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <53B64F3C.6080502@linaro.org> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Tomasz Nowicki , rjw@rjwysocki.net Cc: lenb@kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com, m.chehab@samsung.com, bp@suse.de, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org, rric@kernel.org On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 08:52:44AM +0200, Tomasz Nowicki wrote: > Right, I will fix that and thanks for all you acks. > > BTW, who else should I asked for review to move upstream process one step > further? I think you have enough people on CC and if they would find cycles to review them, they're welcome to do so. But the patches have gotten pretty neat and clean in the meantime so I think Rafael could go over them quickly and maybe even pick them up... :-) -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. --