From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mika Westerberg Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 8/9] Input: gpio_keys_polled - Make use of device property API Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 12:27:53 +0300 Message-ID: <20140819092753.GI1660@lahna.fi.intel.com> References: <1408172039-32513-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> <1408172039-32513-9-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> <20140818105512.7889980b@ultegra> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:28959 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750768AbaHSJ2E (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Aug 2014 05:28:04 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140818105512.7889980b@ultegra> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Jacob Pan Cc: Darren Hart , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Al Stone , Olof Johansson , Matthew Garrett , Matt Fleming , David Woodhouse , "H. Peter Anvin" , Josh Triplett , Aaron Lu , Max Eliaser , Robert Moore , Len Brown , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Linus Walleij , Alexandre Courbot , Mark Brown , Dmitry Torokhov , Bryan Wu , Richard Purdie , Samuel Ortiz , Lee Jones , Grant Likely Rob On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 10:55:12AM -0700, Jacob Pan wrote: > On Sat, 16 Aug 2014 09:53:58 +0300 > Mika Westerberg wrote: > > > From: Aaron Lu > > > > Make use of device property API in this driver so that both OF based > > system and ACPI based system can use this driver. > > > Do we always assume OF and ACPI _DSD will have the same property name > strings? i.e. in this patch "gpios" > > + if (device_property_get(dev, "gpios", NULL)) { > > - if (!of_find_property(pp, "gpios", NULL)) { > > Maybe i missed something, but I don't think we can make that assumption > in BIOS. If not, what is the point of having unified interface? We recommend that when it makes sense, the property names in _DSD follow the corresponding DT names.