Re: [PATCH v4 09/18] ARM64 / ACPI: Parse FADT table to get PSCI flags for PSCI init

Hanjun Guo
2014-09-15T23:34:19Z

On 2014年09月15日 14:38, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 10:00:07PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/psci.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/psci.h
>> index e5312ea..2454bc5 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/psci.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/psci.h
>> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
>> #ifndef __ASM_PSCI_H
>> #define __ASM_PSCI_H
>>
>> -int psci_init(void);
>> +int psci_dt_init(void);
>> +int psci_acpi_init(void);
>>
>> #endif /* __ASM_PSCI_H */
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
>> index 693da7f..9e1ae37 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
>> @@ -13,6 +13,8 @@
>> * published by the Free Software Foundation.
>> */
>>
>> +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "ACPI: " fmt
>> +
>> #include <linux/init.h>
>> #include <linux/acpi.h>
>> #include <linux/cpumask.h>
>> @@ -49,10 +51,32 @@ void __init __acpi_unmap_table(char *map, unsigned long size)
>> early_memunmap(map, size);
>> }
>>
>> +static int __init acpi_parse_fadt(struct acpi_table_header *table)
>> +{
>> + struct acpi_table_fadt *fadt = (struct acpi_table_fadt *)table;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Revision in table header is the FADT Major revision,
>> + * and there is a minor revision of FADT which was introduced
>> + * by ACPI 5.1, we only deal with ACPI 5.1 or higher revision
>> + * to get arm boot flags, or we will disable ACPI.
>> + */
>> + if (table->revision > 5 ||
>> + (table->revision == 5 && fadt->minor_revision >= 1))
>> + return 0;
> The commend and code disagree. The code says 5.1 or newer, while the comment say
> _only_ 5.1. One or the other needs to change.

I describe it in the comments "ACPI 5.1 or higher revision", maybe
"newer revision" will be more explicit.

>
> [...]
>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c
>> index 5539547..15ba470 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c
>> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
>>
>> #define pr_fmt(fmt) "psci: " fmt
>>
>> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
>> #include <linux/init.h>
>> #include <linux/of.h>
>> #include <linux/smp.h>
>> @@ -23,6 +24,7 @@
>> #include <linux/delay.h>
>> #include <uapi/linux/psci.h>
>>
>> +#include <asm/acpi.h>
>> #include <asm/compiler.h>
>> #include <asm/cpu_ops.h>
>> #include <asm/errno.h>
>> @@ -231,6 +233,33 @@ static void psci_sys_poweroff(void)
>> invoke_psci_fn(PSCI_0_2_FN_SYSTEM_OFF, 0, 0, 0);
>> }
>>
>> +static void psci_0_2_set_functions(void)
>> +{
>> + pr_info("Using standard PSCI v0.2 function IDs\n");
>> + psci_function_id[PSCI_FN_CPU_SUSPEND] = PSCI_0_2_FN64_CPU_SUSPEND;
>> + psci_ops.cpu_suspend = psci_cpu_suspend;
>> +
>> + psci_function_id[PSCI_FN_CPU_OFF] = PSCI_0_2_FN_CPU_OFF;
>> + psci_ops.cpu_off = psci_cpu_off;
>> +
>> + psci_function_id[PSCI_FN_CPU_ON] = PSCI_0_2_FN64_CPU_ON;
>> + psci_ops.cpu_on = psci_cpu_on;
>> +
>> + psci_function_id[PSCI_FN_MIGRATE] = PSCI_0_2_FN64_MIGRATE;
>> + psci_ops.migrate = psci_migrate;
>> +
>> + psci_function_id[PSCI_FN_AFFINITY_INFO] = PSCI_0_2_FN64_AFFINITY_INFO;
>> + psci_ops.affinity_info = psci_affinity_info;
>> +
>> + psci_function_id[PSCI_FN_MIGRATE_INFO_TYPE] =
>> + PSCI_0_2_FN_MIGRATE_INFO_TYPE;
>> + psci_ops.migrate_info_type = psci_migrate_info_type;
>> +
>> + arm_pm_restart = psci_sys_reset;
>> +
>> + pm_power_off = psci_sys_poweroff;
>> +}
>> +
>> /*
>> * PSCI Function IDs for v0.2+ are well defined so use
>> * standard values.
>> @@ -264,29 +293,7 @@ static int __init psci_0_2_init(struct device_node *np)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> - pr_info("Using standard PSCI v0.2 function IDs\n");
>> - psci_function_id[PSCI_FN_CPU_SUSPEND] = PSCI_0_2_FN64_CPU_SUSPEND;
>> - psci_ops.cpu_suspend = psci_cpu_suspend;
>> -
>> - psci_function_id[PSCI_FN_CPU_OFF] = PSCI_0_2_FN_CPU_OFF;
>> - psci_ops.cpu_off = psci_cpu_off;
>> -
>> - psci_function_id[PSCI_FN_CPU_ON] = PSCI_0_2_FN64_CPU_ON;
>> - psci_ops.cpu_on = psci_cpu_on;
>> -
>> - psci_function_id[PSCI_FN_MIGRATE] = PSCI_0_2_FN64_MIGRATE;
>> - psci_ops.migrate = psci_migrate;
>> -
>> - psci_function_id[PSCI_FN_AFFINITY_INFO] = PSCI_0_2_FN64_AFFINITY_INFO;
>> - psci_ops.affinity_info = psci_affinity_info;
>> -
>> - psci_function_id[PSCI_FN_MIGRATE_INFO_TYPE] =
>> - PSCI_0_2_FN_MIGRATE_INFO_TYPE;
>> - psci_ops.migrate_info_type = psci_migrate_info_type;
>> -
>> - arm_pm_restart = psci_sys_reset;
>> -
>> - pm_power_off = psci_sys_poweroff;
>> + psci_0_2_set_functions();
>>
>> out_put_node:
>> of_node_put(np);
>> @@ -339,7 +346,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id psci_of_match[] __initconst = {
>> {},
>> };
>>
>> -int __init psci_init(void)
>> +int __init psci_dt_init(void)
>> {
>> struct device_node *np;
>> const struct of_device_id *matched_np;
>> @@ -354,6 +361,29 @@ int __init psci_init(void)
>> return init_fn(np);
>> }
>>
>> +/*
>> + * We use PSCI 0.2+ when ACPI is deployed on ARM64 and it's
>> + * explicitly clarified in SBBR
>> + */
>> +int __init psci_acpi_init(void)
>> +{
>> + if (!acpi_psci_present()) {
>> + pr_info("is not implemented in ACPI.\n");
>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> + }
>> +
>> + pr_info("probing for conduit method from ACPI.\n");
>> +
>> + if (acpi_psci_use_hvc())
>> + invoke_psci_fn = __invoke_psci_fn_hvc;
>> + else
>> + invoke_psci_fn = __invoke_psci_fn_smc;
>> +
>> + psci_0_2_set_functions();
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>>
>> static int __init cpu_psci_cpu_init(struct device_node *dn, unsigned int cpu)
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
>> index 5796734..7ba20d4 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
>> @@ -398,10 +398,12 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
>> efi_idmap_init();
>>
>> cpu_logical_map(0) = read_cpuid_mpidr() & MPIDR_HWID_BITMASK;
>> - if (acpi_disabled)
>> + if (acpi_disabled) {
>> unflatten_device_tree();
>> -
>> - psci_init();
>> + psci_dt_init();
>> + } else {
>> + psci_acpi_init();
>> + }
> This is slightly nitty now, but I think it'd be slightly easier to follow
> boot path if the switch for acpi disabled/enabled was in psci.c. It'd also allow
> psci_dt_init() and psci_acpi_init() to be static.
>
> I.e. keep a psci_init() and just make it call one or the other.

Do you mean something like blow in psci.c?

int __init psci_init(void)
{
if (acpi_disabled)
return psci_dt_init();
else
return psci_acpi_init();
}

Thanks
Hanjun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html