public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>
To: Frans Klaver <fransklaver@gmail.com>
Cc: Corentin Chary <corentin.chary@gmail.com>,
	Rafael Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	acpi4asus-user@lists.sourceforge.net,
	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/13] eeepc-laptop: compare proper return values in get_cpufv
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 14:49:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140915214902.GB64909@vmdeb7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1410563212-31565-11-git-send-email-fransklaver@gmail.com>

On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 01:06:49AM +0200, Frans Klaver wrote:
> In get_cpufv the return value of get_acpi is stored in the cpufv struct.
> Right before this value is checked for errors, it is and'ed with 0xff.
> This means c->cur can never be less than zero. Besides that, the actual
> error value is ignored.
> 
> c->num is also and'ed with 0xff, which means we can ignore values below
> zero.
> 
> Check the result of get_acpi() right away. While at it, propagate the
> error if we got one.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Frans Klaver <fransklaver@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c b/drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c
> index 47488d3..828db56 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c
> @@ -332,9 +332,12 @@ struct eeepc_cpufv {
>  static int get_cpufv(struct eeepc_laptop *eeepc, struct eeepc_cpufv *c)
>  {
>  	c->cur = get_acpi(eeepc, CM_ASL_CPUFV);
> +	if (c->cur < 0)
> +		return c->cur;
> +
>  	c->num = (c->cur >> 8) & 0xff;
>  	c->cur &= 0xff;
> -	if (c->cur < 0 || c->num <= 0 || c->num > 12)
> +	if (c->num == 0 || c->num > 12)
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  	return 0;

This patch is fine as is. However, Greg has supported propogating the error code
through to the sysfs interface (if I understand him correctly on an earlier post
to this list). This would require an addition change to this patch would
propogated the get_cpufv error code in show_available_cpuv(), show_cpuv(), and
store_cpuv(). As it is, we return -ENODEV on any failure, where an ACPI call
error should probably return -ENXIO as I understand it.

However, there was a rather famous change in error code handling in which pulse
audio broke and Linus was very upset with one of his maintainers.

How do we know when it is acceptable to change which error code is returned?

-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center

       reply	other threads:[~2014-09-15 21:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1410563212-31565-1-git-send-email-fransklaver@gmail.com>
     [not found] ` <1410563212-31565-11-git-send-email-fransklaver@gmail.com>
2014-09-15 21:49   ` Darren Hart [this message]
2014-09-15 21:51     ` [PATCH 10/13] eeepc-laptop: compare proper return values in get_cpufv Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-09-15 21:55       ` Frans Klaver
2014-09-16 11:54         ` Frans Klaver
2014-09-16 20:52           ` Darren Hart
2014-09-16 21:10             ` Frans Klaver
2014-09-16 23:39               ` Darren Hart
2014-09-16 21:27             ` Darren Hart
2014-09-16 21:33               ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-09-16 21:40               ` Frans Klaver
2014-09-16 21:43                 ` Darren Hart
2014-09-17 10:34               ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2014-09-17 11:57                 ` Frans Klaver
2014-09-17 16:12                   ` Darren Hart

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140915214902.GB64909@vmdeb7 \
    --to=dvhart@infradead.org \
    --cc=acpi4asus-user@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=corentin.chary@gmail.com \
    --cc=fransklaver@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox