* Re: [PATCH 1/2] intel-rst: Use ACPI_FAILURE() macro instead !ACPI_SUCCESS() for error checking
[not found] ` <1410902036-10282-2-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@gmail.com>
@ 2014-09-16 22:49 ` Darren Hart
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Darren Hart @ 2014-09-16 22:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Ujfalusi; +Cc: mjg59, platform-driver-x86, linux-kernel, linux-acpi
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 12:13:55AM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> ACPI_SUCCESS is defined as:
> #define ACPI_SUCCESS(a) (!(a))
>
> There is no need for the the double ! since there is already a macro
> defined for failures: ACPI_FAILURE()
>
Cc: linux-acpi
Thanks,
Darren
> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/intel-rst.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel-rst.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel-rst.c
> index d45bca3..8c6a8fe 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel-rst.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel-rst.c
> @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ static ssize_t irst_show_wakeup_events(struct device *dev,
> acpi = to_acpi_device(dev);
>
> status = acpi_evaluate_integer(acpi->handle, "GFFS", NULL, &value);
> - if (!ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> return sprintf(buf, "%lld\n", value);
> @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ static ssize_t irst_store_wakeup_events(struct device *dev,
>
> status = acpi_execute_simple_method(acpi->handle, "SFFS", value);
>
> - if (!ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> return count;
> @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ static ssize_t irst_show_wakeup_time(struct device *dev,
> acpi = to_acpi_device(dev);
>
> status = acpi_evaluate_integer(acpi->handle, "GFTV", NULL, &value);
> - if (!ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> return sprintf(buf, "%lld\n", value);
> @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ static ssize_t irst_store_wakeup_time(struct device *dev,
>
> status = acpi_execute_simple_method(acpi->handle, "SFTV", value);
>
> - if (!ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> return count;
> --
> 2.1.0
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe platform-driver-x86" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] intel-rst: Clean up ACPI add function
[not found] ` <1410902036-10282-3-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@gmail.com>
@ 2014-09-16 23:25 ` Darren Hart
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Darren Hart @ 2014-09-16 23:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Ujfalusi; +Cc: mjg59, platform-driver-x86, linux-kernel, linux-acpi
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 12:13:56AM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> There is no need to initialize the error since it is going to be assigned
> with the return status of at least on of the device_create_file() call.
>
> We can return directly in case the first file creation fails.
> All the labels for goto can be removed (along with the gotos) as well.
> Tell the compiler that the failures are unlikely so it can create better
> binaries.
Looks reasonable to me.
Cc: linux-acpi
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/intel-rst.c | 15 +++++----------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel-rst.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel-rst.c
> index 8c6a8fe..7344d84 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel-rst.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel-rst.c
> @@ -119,21 +119,16 @@ static struct device_attribute irst_timeout_attr = {
>
> static int irst_add(struct acpi_device *acpi)
> {
> - int error = 0;
> + int error;
>
> error = device_create_file(&acpi->dev, &irst_timeout_attr);
> - if (error)
> - goto out;
> + if (unlikely(error))
> + return error;
>
> error = device_create_file(&acpi->dev, &irst_wakeup_attr);
> - if (error)
> - goto out_timeout;
> + if (unlikely(error))
> + device_remove_file(&acpi->dev, &irst_timeout_attr);
>
> - return 0;
> -
> -out_timeout:
> - device_remove_file(&acpi->dev, &irst_timeout_attr);
> -out:
> return error;
> }
>
> --
> 2.1.0
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe platform-driver-x86" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-09-16 23:25 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <1410902036-10282-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <1410902036-10282-2-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@gmail.com>
2014-09-16 22:49 ` [PATCH 1/2] intel-rst: Use ACPI_FAILURE() macro instead !ACPI_SUCCESS() for error checking Darren Hart
[not found] ` <1410902036-10282-3-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@gmail.com>
2014-09-16 23:25 ` [PATCH 2/2] intel-rst: Clean up ACPI add function Darren Hart
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox