From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] PM / sleep: Support for quiescing timers during suspend-to-idle Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 09:13:42 +0100 Message-ID: <20150213081342.GM2896@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <8292243.ibkmfVtXac@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8292243.ibkmfVtXac@vostro.rjw.lan> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Alan Cox , "Li, Aubrey" , LKML , Linux PM list , ACPI Devel Maling List , Kristen Carlson Accardi , John Stultz , Len Brown List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 05:00:15AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi, > > This series adds support for quiescing timers during the last state of > suspend-to-idle transitions. > > Patches [1-4/6] together are functionally equivalent to the combo RFC patch > I sent last time (http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=142344909201464&w=4). > > Patches [5-6/6] add ->enter_freeze callback implementations to intel_idle > and the ACPI cpuidle driver. > > [1/6] - Rework the suspend-to-idle "mechanics" in preparation for the subsequent > changes. The existing functionality should not change after this. > [2/6] - Modify update_fast_timekeeper() to take struct tk_read_base pointers as > arguments. > [3/6] - Make it safe to use the fast timekeeper while suspended. > [4/6] - Support for quiescing timers during suspend-to-idle (core part). > [5/6] - ->enter_freeze callback for intel_idle. > [6/6] - ->enter_freeze callback for ACPI cpuidle. > > This works as expected on everything I have in my office and can readily test. > > The patches should apply without any problems on top of the current Linus' tree. Thanks for the updates, looks good to me. Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel)