From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Will Deacon Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/21] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1 Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 18:54:00 +0000 Message-ID: <20150320185400.GK1474@arm.com> References: <1426077587-1561-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <20150318190509.GM10863@arm.com> <550A4BFD.4070804@huawei.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:41086 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751265AbbCTSyH (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Mar 2015 14:54:07 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <550A4BFD.4070804@huawei.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Hanjun Guo Cc: "hanjun.guo@linaro.org" , Catalin Marinas , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Olof Johansson , "grant.likely@linaro.org" , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Arnd Bergmann , Mark Rutland , "graeme.gregory@linaro.org" , Sudeep Holla , "jcm@redhat.com" , Marc Zyngier , Mark Brown , Robert Richter , Timur Tabi , Ashwin Chaugule , "suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com" , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.or On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 04:09:33AM +0000, Hanjun Guo wrote: > On 2015/3/19 3:05, Will Deacon wrote: > > If you can get that in place, I'm not opposed to putting this into > > linux-next ahead of the firmware summit in San Jose next week. Note= that > > this is not a commitment for 4.1, since I'm keen to see the outcome= s of > > next week before setting anything in stone. >=20 > OK, I will stick to this mailing list and respond as soon as I can. This doesn't even build for me: $ make ARCH=3Darm64 CROSS_COMPILE=3Daarch64-none-linux-gnu- allmodconfi= g $ make ARCH=3Darm64 CROSS_COMPILE=3Daarch64-none-linux-gnu- Image [...] In file included from drivers/xen/acpi.c:33:0: include/xen/acpi.h: In function =E2=80=98xen_acpi_sleep_register=E2=80=99= : include/xen/acpi.h:102:3: error: =E2=80=98acpi_suspend_lowlevel=E2=80=99= undeclared (first use in this function) acpi_suspend_lowlevel =3D xen_acpi_suspend_lowlevel; ^ include/xen/acpi.h:102:3: note: each undeclared identifier is reported = only once for each function it appears in drivers/xen/acpi.c: In function =E2=80=98xen_acpi_notify_hypervisor_sta= te=E2=80=99: drivers/xen/acpi.c:61:2: error: implicit declaration of function =E2=80= =98HYPERVISOR_dom0_op=E2=80=99 [-Werror=3Dimplicit-function-declaration= ] HYPERVISOR_dom0_op(&op); ^ cc1: some warnings being treated as errors make[2]: *** [drivers/xen/acpi.o] Error 1 make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... make[1]: *** [drivers/xen] Error 2 make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... make: *** [drivers] Error 2 Am I missing some other patches? Will -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html