From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Catalin Marinas Subject: Re: [patch v11 23/23] ARM64 / ACPI: Don't unflatten device tree if acpi=force is passed Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 17:31:07 +0000 Message-ID: <20150325173107.GQ14585@localhost> References: <1427205776-5060-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <1427205776-5060-24-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1427205776-5060-24-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Hanjun Guo Cc: Mark Rutland , linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org, Will Deacon , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Timur Tabi , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Mark Salter , Grant Likely , Robert Richter , Arnd Bergmann , Marc Zyngier , Jon Masters , Mark Brown , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Graeme Gregory , Ashwin Chaugule , Ard Biesheuvel , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Suravee Suthikulpanit , Sudeep Holla , Olof Johansson List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:02:56PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote: > Since the policy is that once we pass acpi=force in the early > param, we will not unflatten device tree even if ACPI is disabled > in ACPI table init fails, so fix the code by comparinging both > acpi_disabled and param_acpi_force before the device tree is > unflattened. > > CC: Ard Biesheuvel > Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo Acked-by: Catalin Marinas but as I said, we should take Lorenzo's patch on top as well.