From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] ACPI / blacklist: blacklist Win8 OSI for Dell Inspiron 7437 Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 20:13:59 +0100 Message-ID: <20150514191358.GB23853@srcf.ucam.org> References: <1429759476-13186-1-git-send-email-alex.hung@canonical.com> <20150424082115.GA3783@srcf.ucam.org> <20150427174646.GA22664@srcf.ucam.org> <20150428052448.GA3458@srcf.ucam.org> <20150428171100.GA24599@srcf.ucam.org> <5554F12A.3010003@dell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:52179 "EHLO cavan.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964981AbbENTOD (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 May 2015 15:14:03 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5554F12A.3010003@dell.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Mario Limonciello Cc: Alex Hung , Linux ACPI Mailing List On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 02:02:02PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote: > * Battery information was not displayed in the OS. The BIOS team > found that the Linux wasn't asking for battery information in the OS > in the same way that Windows does. The delta path creates a SMI > event to get battery information. Huh. Is there any chance we can find out what the difference is so we can make them equivalent? -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org