From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Darren Hart Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Use acpi_video_unregister_backlight instead of acpi_video_unregister in platfrom backlight drivers Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 20:46:18 -0700 Message-ID: <20150603034618.GC49670@vmdeb7> References: <1433150708-8498-1-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1433150708-8498-1-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com> Sender: platform-driver-x86-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Hans de Goede Cc: Ben Skeggs , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Aaron Lu , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Corentin Chary List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 11:25:05AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm working on cleaning up the currently somewhat convoluted logic to > select which backlight interfaces to register on x86 systems, see: > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2014-December/074687.html > > For a rought outline (details will change in the actual patch-set). > > These 3 patches are a preparation for that work, as the behavior of the > current code is not always consistent (it changes depending on module > loading order in some cases). These 3 patches remove this inconsistency > which in some cases may result in a behavior change. > > This way the cleanup can have a consistent base to build upon, and I can > ensure that the cleanup itself does not cause any functional changes. > > I hope to post a v1 of the actual cleanup patch-set in 1-2 weeks. Letting these sit in my testing branch while awaiting at ack from Corentin on 2 of the 3. -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center