From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vinod Koul Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] acpi-dma: Add support for "dma-names" device property Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 21:05:28 +0530 Message-ID: <20150924153528.GB2381@localhost> References: <1442241456-75340-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> <1442241456-75340-2-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mga14.intel.com ([192.55.52.115]:46925 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754122AbbIXPcp (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Sep 2015 11:32:45 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1442241456-75340-2-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Mika Westerberg Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Dan Williams , Andy Shevchenko , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 05:37:36PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > The current implementation hard codes the two supported channels so that > "tx" is always 0 and "rx" is always 1. This is because there has been no > suitable way in ACPI to name resources. > > With _DSD device properties we can finally do this: > > Device (SPI1) { > Name (_CRS, ResourceTemplate () { > ... > FixedDMA (0x0000, 0x0000, Width32bit) > FixedDMA (0x0001, 0x0001, Width32bit) > }) > > Name (_DSD, Package () { > ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"), > Package () { > Package () {"dma-names", Package () {"tx", "rx"}} > }, > }) > } > > The names "tx" and "rx" now provide index of the FixedDMA resource in > question. > > Modify acpi_dma_request_slave_chan_by_name() so that it looks for > "dma-names" property first and only then fall back using hardcoded indices. > > The DT "dma-names" binding that we reuse for ACPI is documented in > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/dma.txt. Acked-by: Vinod Koul This is actually good and will help a lot. Btw would like to see some tested-by tags, perhaps on dw dma or idma... -- ~Vinod