From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] ACPI / EC: Fix broken big-endian 64bit platforms using 'global_lock' Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 16:37:58 -0700 Message-ID: <20150924233758.GB5951@linux> References: <9b705747a138c96c26faee5218f7b47403195b28.1442305897.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> <1515364.kIriLUmZv6@vostro.rjw.lan> <1AE640813FDE7649BE1B193DEA596E883406510E@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1AE640813FDE7649BE1B193DEA596E883406510E@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Zheng, Lv" Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" , "linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org" , "sboyd@codeaurora.org" , "arnd@arndb.de" , "stable@vger.kernel.org" , Len Brown , "open list:ACPI" , open list List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On 23-09-15, 07:52, Zheng, Lv wrote: > And IMO, if we really want to change global_lock, we should make it bool here. Yeah, so the second patch in this series is doing just that. Just kept this patch separate to make more sense. Will resend both and keep you in cc. -- viresh