From: Dustin Byford <dustin@cumulusnetworks.com>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ben Gardner <gardner.ben@gmail.com>, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ACPI: Can I use I2cSerialBus with a PCI I2C controller?
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 14:11:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151027211111.GA6011@cumulusnetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151023082054.GP1526@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Hi Mika,
On Fri Oct 23 11:20, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> You should either use proper _HID/_CID for the device or put "PRP0001"
> to the _HID and let the match happen with DT .compatible strings. I've
> attached a hack that I use locally.
I have a similar hack over here. I have a question though:
> The corresponding ASL fragment would look like:
>
>
> Device (AT24)
> {
> Name (_HID, "PRP0001")
>
> Method (_CRS, 0, Serialized) {
> Name (UBUF, ResourceTemplate () {
> I2cSerialBus (0x50, ControllerInitiated, 0x00061A80,
> AddressingMode7Bit, "\\_SB.I2C6",
> 0x00, ResourceConsumer)
> })
> Return (UBUF)
> }
>
> Name (_DSD, Package () {
> ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"),
> Package () {
> Package () {"compatible", "atmel,24c02"},
The "c02" in 24c02 also indicates the size. I've always found it a
little awkward when you could have a compatible string that disagrees
with firmware properties. Should we do something about that?
For example, is the more generic string, "atmel,at24" better? I'm not
sure I like that approach in general, but it works well for the at24
devices. at25 does it the same way.
> Package () {"size", 256},
> Package () {"pagesize", 32},
> Package () {"abs-value", 1},
> },
> })
>
> Method (_STA, 0, NotSerialized)
> {
> Return (0xF)
> }
> }
--Dustin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-27 21:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-20 19:47 ACPI: Can I use I2cSerialBus with a PCI I2C controller? Ben Gardner
2015-10-21 8:50 ` Mika Westerberg
2015-10-21 23:14 ` Ben Gardner
2015-10-22 8:01 ` Mika Westerberg
2015-10-22 16:19 ` Ben Gardner
2015-10-22 17:17 ` Ben Gardner
2015-10-23 8:20 ` Mika Westerberg
2015-10-23 9:43 ` Mika Westerberg
2015-10-23 17:24 ` Ben Gardner
2015-10-26 19:56 ` Ben Gardner
2015-10-27 10:49 ` Mika Westerberg
2015-10-27 21:11 ` Dustin Byford [this message]
2015-10-28 9:01 ` Mika Westerberg
2015-10-30 16:51 ` Ben Gardner
2015-11-02 10:25 ` Mika Westerberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151027211111.GA6011@cumulusnetworks.com \
--to=dustin@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=gardner.ben@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).