From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] acpi: Fix proper return code for function acpi_gsi_to_irq Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 23:13:05 +0100 Message-ID: <20160111221305.GH4665@pd.tnic> References: <1446857519-5908-1-git-send-email-lho@apm.com> <1446857519-5908-2-git-send-email-lho@apm.com> <20160110110714.GA22896@pd.tnic> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:40240 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758752AbcAKWNS (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jan 2016 17:13:18 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Tuan Phan Cc: Loc Ho , dougthompson@xmission.com, mchehab@osg.samsung.com, tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org, fu.wei@linaro.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, lenb@kernel.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Jon Masters , patches@apm.com On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 02:04:52PM -0800, Tuan Phan wrote: > Hi Boris, > The same function which is implemented for x86 > (arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c) also returns 0 on success and -1 on > failure. If we need to change the API, need to change for X86 too > which we don't have a way to test it. Well, fortunately, I have an x86 box to test it :-) -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.