From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] acpi: Fix proper return code for function acpi_gsi_to_irq Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 20:21:17 +0100 Message-ID: <20160112192117.GL30558@pd.tnic> References: <1446857519-5908-1-git-send-email-lho@apm.com> <1446857519-5908-2-git-send-email-lho@apm.com> <20160110110714.GA22896@pd.tnic> <20160111221305.GH4665@pd.tnic> <20160112143653.GB30558@pd.tnic> <20160112183228.GK30558@pd.tnic> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:37963 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751515AbcALTVb (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jan 2016 14:21:31 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Tuan Phan Cc: Loc Ho , dougthompson@xmission.com, mchehab@osg.samsung.com, Tomasz Nowicki , Fu Wei , rjw@rjwysocki.net, Len Brown , linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Jon Masters , patches@apm.com, Thomas Gleixner On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:46:15AM -0800, Tuan Phan wrote: > Well, it basically the same as old code except the change of API > interface. And it requires some changes in ACPI core and X86/I64 arch > code. That's why I said: "Patch 1 could be improved. It is Rafael's call in the end of the day." -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.