Re: [PATCH 3/6] cpufreq: governor: New data type for management part of dbs_data

Viresh Kumar
2016-03-04T05:49:24Z

On 03-03-16, 20:26, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> So this is a totally bicycle shed discussion argument which makes it
> seriously irritating.
>
> Does it really matter so much how this structure is called?
> Essentially, it is something to build your tunables structure around
> and you can treat it as a counterpart of a C++ abstract class. So the
> name *does* make sense in that context.

:(

I thought you will apply this patch to linux-next *now*, as it was quite
independent and so gave such comment.

> That said, what about gov_attr_set?

Maybe just gov_kobj or whatever you wish.

--
viresh