From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>,
Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>, Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>,
Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@arm.com>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
devel@acpica.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Robert Richter <rrichter@cavium.com>,
David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] ACPI NUMA support for ARM64
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 12:13:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160425111338.GJ16065@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1461116439-22991-1-git-send-email-ddaney.cavm@gmail.com>
Hi David,
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 06:40:25PM -0700, David Daney wrote:
> From: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
>
> Based on v16 of device-tree NUMA patch set for arm64 [1],this patch
> set introduce the ACPI based configuration to provide NUMA
> information.
>
> ACPI 5.1 already introduced NUMA support for ARM64, which can get the
> NUMA domain information from SRAT and SLIT table, so parse those two
> tables to get mappings from cpu/mem to numa node configuration and
> system locality.
Whilst I've queued the main NUMA series for arm64, I'd really like to
see more movement on the generic header file cleanups that you posted
separately:
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1456358528-24213-1-git-send-email-ddaney.cavm@gmail.com
Given that this ACPI series already requires some significant cross-arch
interaction (which is actually good!), perhaps extending the clean-up
patches to encompass some of the ACPI bits might make sense, and we can
get that queued as a pre-requisite.
Will
> v5 updates:
>
> - Fixed ia64 build failure by gating some unused functions with #if
> CONFIG_{X86,ARM64}.
>
> - Fixed section mismatch errors for X86 case.
>
> - Removed unneeded #include from some files.
>
> - Tested to build cleanly on ARM64, X86_64, IA64
>
> v4 updates:
>
> - Updated from Hanjun Guo's v3 patches.
>
> - Rebased on top of v16 of device-tree NUMA patches.
>
> - Reordered some of the changes so that we don't introduce code and
> then change it several times in the patch set. New code is
> introduced in its final form. Code reused from x86 is first moved
> with no change, and then a separate patch to make any needed
> changes.
>
> - code that is used only by ia64, moved to architecture specific
> files.
>
> v3 updates:
> - Deep investigation about the ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT() and remvoe
> that for acpi/numa.c (patch 2/12)
>
> - Remove the duplicate NULL check for table print (patch 3/12)
>
> - Introduce CONFIG_ACPI_HAS_NUMA_ARCH_FIXUP to remove duplicate
> dummy function for acpi_numa_arch_fixup()
>
> - Solve the problem that the mapping from logical cpu to numa node
> is wrong which spotted out by Lorenzo
>
> - cleanups for x86 and move acpi_numa_slit_init() and some other
> functions to common place, then reduce the duplicate of x86
> and arm64 (patch 7-12/12).
>
> - rebased on top of 4.4 and Ganapat's v9 patch set.
>
> [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/4/8/571
>
> David Daney (1):
> acpi, numa, srat: Improve SRAT error detection and add messages.
>
> Hanjun Guo (11):
> acpi, numa: Use pr_fmt() instead of printk
> acpi, numa: Replace ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT() with pr_debug()
> acpi, numa: remove duplicate NULL check
> acpi, numa: move acpi_numa_slit_init() to drivers/acpi/numa.c
> arm64, numa: rework numa_add_memblk()
> x86, acpi, numa: cleanup acpi_numa_processor_affinity_init()
> acpi, numa: move bad_srat() and srat_disabled() to
> drivers/acpi/numa.c
> acpi, numa: remove unneeded acpi_numa=1
> acpi, numa: Move acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init() to
> drivers/acpi/numa.c
> arm64, acpi, numa: NUMA support based on SRAT and SLIT
> acpi, numa: Enable ACPI based NUMA on ARM64
>
> Robert Richter (2):
> acpi, numa: Move acpi_numa_arch_fixup() to ia64 only
> arm64, acpi, numa: Default enable ACPI_NUMA with NUMA
>
> arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h | 8 ++
> arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h | 2 +
> arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile | 1 +
> arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 149 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 2 +
> arch/arm64/mm/numa.c | 17 ++--
> arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h | 3 +
> arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c | 2 +-
> arch/ia64/kernel/setup.c | 1 +
> arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h | 1 -
> arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/mm/srat.c | 116 +---------------------
> drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 4 +-
> drivers/acpi/numa.c | 224 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> drivers/of/of_numa.c | 4 +-
> include/acpi/acpi_numa.h | 4 +
> include/linux/acpi.h | 18 +++-
> 17 files changed, 375 insertions(+), 183 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
>
> --
> 1.7.11.7
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-25 11:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-20 1:40 [PATCH v5 00/14] ACPI NUMA support for ARM64 David Daney
2016-04-20 1:40 ` [PATCH v5 01/14] acpi, numa: Use pr_fmt() instead of printk David Daney
2016-04-20 1:40 ` [PATCH v5 02/14] acpi, numa: Replace ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT() with pr_debug() David Daney
2016-04-20 1:40 ` [PATCH v5 03/14] acpi, numa: remove duplicate NULL check David Daney
2016-04-20 1:40 ` [PATCH v5 04/14] acpi, numa: Move acpi_numa_arch_fixup() to ia64 only David Daney
2016-04-26 5:15 ` Hanjun Guo
2016-04-20 1:40 ` [PATCH v5 05/14] acpi, numa: move acpi_numa_slit_init() to drivers/acpi/numa.c David Daney
2016-04-20 1:40 ` [PATCH v5 06/14] arm64, numa: rework numa_add_memblk() David Daney
2016-04-20 1:40 ` [PATCH v5 07/14] x86, acpi, numa: cleanup acpi_numa_processor_affinity_init() David Daney
2016-04-20 1:40 ` [PATCH v5 08/14] acpi, numa: move bad_srat() and srat_disabled() to drivers/acpi/numa.c David Daney
2016-04-20 1:40 ` [PATCH v5 09/14] acpi, numa: remove unneeded acpi_numa=1 David Daney
2016-04-20 1:40 ` [PATCH v5 10/14] acpi, numa: Move acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init() to drivers/acpi/numa.c David Daney
2016-04-20 1:40 ` [PATCH v5 11/14] acpi, numa, srat: Improve SRAT error detection and add messages David Daney
2016-04-20 1:40 ` [PATCH v5 12/14] arm64, acpi, numa: NUMA support based on SRAT and SLIT David Daney
2016-04-20 7:41 ` Dennis Chen
2016-04-20 8:31 ` Ganapatrao Kulkarni
2016-04-20 16:29 ` David Daney
2016-04-21 10:06 ` Dennis Chen
2016-04-27 1:14 ` David Daney
2016-04-27 4:04 ` Hanjun Guo
2016-04-27 11:37 ` Dennis Chen
2016-04-27 15:40 ` David Daney
2016-04-20 1:40 ` [PATCH v5 13/14] acpi, numa: Enable ACPI based NUMA on ARM64 David Daney
2016-04-20 1:40 ` [PATCH v5 14/14] arm64, acpi, numa: Default enable ACPI_NUMA with NUMA David Daney
2016-04-25 11:13 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2016-04-25 16:47 ` [PATCH v5 00/14] ACPI NUMA support for ARM64 David Daney
2016-04-26 5:31 ` Hanjun Guo
2016-04-26 12:15 ` Will Deacon
2016-04-26 13:03 ` Hanjun Guo
2016-04-26 13:35 ` Will Deacon
2016-04-26 16:48 ` David Daney
2016-04-27 1:49 ` Hanjun Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160425111338.GJ16065@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=Marc.Zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=david.daney@cavium.com \
--cc=ddaney.cavm@gmail.com \
--cc=devel@acpica.org \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lv.zheng@intel.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=rrichter@cavium.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).