From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mika Westerberg Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] acpi i2c: Initialize info.type from of_compatible Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 15:19:28 +0300 Message-ID: <20160617121928.GL1739@lahna.fi.intel.com> References: <13cb5b7766b1b25a2bb61ce0053a38f6f440907b.1466014238.git.leonard.crestez@intel.com> <20160616081145.GU1740@lahna.fi.intel.com> <2ca8f355-bb28-8b68-7579-e26eaee3550a@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:38944 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752815AbcFQMTd (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jun 2016 08:19:33 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2ca8f355-bb28-8b68-7579-e26eaee3550a@intel.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Crestez Dan Leonard Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Wolfram Sang , linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Octavian Purdila , Jarkko Nikula On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 03:07:39PM +0300, Crestez Dan Leonard wrote: > On 06/16/2016 11:11 AM, Mika Westerberg wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 09:30:28PM +0300, Crestez Dan Leonard wrote: > >> When using devicetree i2c_board_info.type is set to the compatible > >> string with the vendor prefix removed. For I2C devices described via > >> ACPI the i2c_board_info.type string is set to the ACPI device name. When > >> using ACPI and DT ids this string ends up something like "PRP0001:00". > >> > >> If the of_compatible property is present try to use that instead. This > >> makes it easier to instantiate i2c drivers through ACPI with DT ids. > > > > Adding Jarkko -- he was the original author of I2C/SPI device naming in > > ACPI. Since this only affects devices with PRP0001 in their _HID/_CID, > > it should not break anything. > > It's possible to have something like this: > > Name (_HID, "XXX1234") > Name (_CID, "PRP0001") > Name (_DSD, Package () { > ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"), > Package () { > Package () {"compatible", "vendor,x1234"}, > } > }) > > With these patches the i2c device name changes from "XXX1234:00" to > "x1234". This would happen even if a driver matches the XXX1234 acpi ID. > It's not clear if anyone actually uses that or if this change would be > harmful. I have not seen a single machine using _DSD with PRP0001 so I don't think it is a problem. > It theory it would be possible to use of_compatible for naming only if > there are no other real IDs. I don't think it's worthwhile. I agree.