From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] acpi_lpss/pwm: Fix i915 pwm_get issues
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 17:14:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170122161409.21601-1-hdegoede@redhat.com> (raw)
Hi All,
Here is another attempt at fixing i915 not finding the lpss_pwm
device (fixed by calling pwm_table_add from apci_lpss.c) as well
as i915 not being capable of pwm_get returning -EPROBE_DEFER.
I must sat I rather like this version (vs forcing pwm-lpss* to be
builtin), so I hope we can move forward to this.
As the acpi/lpss changes (patch 3/3) now rely on some core pwm
changes (the first 2 patches) I suggest simply merging all 3 patches
through the pwm tree. Rafael if that is ok with you, can we have
your Acked-by please ?
Regards,
Hans
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next reply other threads:[~2017-01-22 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-22 16:14 Hans de Goede [this message]
2017-01-22 16:14 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] pwm/core: Don't hold pwm_lookup_lock longer then necessary Hans de Goede
2017-01-22 16:14 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] pwm/core: Try to get the module from pwm_get Hans de Goede
2017-01-30 8:17 ` Thierry Reding
2017-01-30 14:18 ` Hans de Goede
2017-01-22 16:14 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] acpi: lpss: call pwm_add_table() for bsw PWM device Hans de Goede
2017-01-30 8:18 ` Thierry Reding
2017-01-30 8:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-01-30 9:33 ` Mika Westerberg
2017-01-30 9:47 ` Thierry Reding
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170122161409.21601-1-hdegoede@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox