From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Will Deacon Subject: Re: [v5 1/4] ACPICA: IORT: Add Cavium ThunderX2 SMMUv3 model definition. Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 11:24:59 +0100 Message-ID: <20170512102459.GF26181@arm.com> References: <1494415918-13770-1-git-send-email-gakula@caviumnetworks.com> <3122711.vgvub3W1fy@aspire.rjw.lan> <20170511084525.GA18839@arm.com> <3624921.NlXkYaVXxR@aspire.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:58026 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756846AbdELKYy (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 May 2017 06:24:54 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3624921.NlXkYaVXxR@aspire.rjw.lan> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Geetha sowjanya , Lv Zheng , Robert Moore , robin.murphy@arm.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, hanjun.guo@linaro.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, jcm@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robert.richter@cavium.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, sgoutham@cavium.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, geethasowjanya.akula@gmail.com, linu.cherian@cavium.com, Charles.Garcia-Tobin@arm.com, Geetha Sowjanya On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 04:40:51PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday, May 11, 2017 09:45:25 AM Will Deacon wrote: > > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 02:26:02AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Wednesday, May 10, 2017 05:01:55 PM Geetha sowjanya wrote: > > > > From: Linu Cherian > > > > > > > > Add SMMUv3 model definition for ThunderX2. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Linu Cherian > > > > Signed-off-by: Geetha Sowjanya > > > > > > This is an ACPICA change, but you have not included the ACPICA maintainers > > > into your original CC list (added now). > > > > > > Bob, Lv, how should this be routed? > > > > > > Do you want to apply this patch upstream first or can we make this change in > > > Linux and upstream in parallel? That shouldn't be a big deal, right? > > > > I think we're still waiting for the updated IORT document to be published (I > > think this should be in the next week or so), so I don't think we should > > commit the new ID before that happens. > > OK, thanks for the heads-up. > > I think it's better to submit the actbl2.h update directly to ACPICA > upstream when the doc is published and then work on top of that. The doc is now published: http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.den0049c/DEN0049C_IO_Remapping_Table.pdf so the new model numbers are confirmed. Cheers, Will