From: "Lee, Chun-Yi" <joeyli.kernel@gmail.com>
To: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Lee,
Chun-Yi" <jlee@suse.com>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v3] acpi: indicate to platform when hot remove returns busy
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 19:18:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170613111837.14170-1-jlee@suse.com> (raw)
In hotplug logic, it always indicates non-specific failure to
platform through _OST when handing acpi hot-remove event failed. Then
platform terminates the hot-remove process but it can not identify
the reason.
Base on current hot-remove code, there have two situations that it
returns busy:
- OSPM try to offline an individual device, but the device offline
function returns busy.
- When the ejection event is applied to an "not offlined yet" container.
OSPM send kobject change event to userspace and returns busy.
Both of them will returns -EBUSY to acpi device hotplug function then
hotplug function indicates non-specific failure to platform just like
any other error, e.g. -ENODEV or -EIO.
The benefit to platform for identifying the OS busy state is that
platform can be applied different approach to handle the busy but
not just terminate the hot-remove process by unknown reason. For
example, platform can wait for a while then triggers hot-remove
again.
This RFC patch adds one more parameter to the handler function of
acpi generic hotplug event to give the function a chance to propose
the return code of _OST. In this case, it sets ost return code to
ACPI_OST_SC_DEVICE_BUSY when the acpi hot remove function returns
-EBUSY.
v3:
Removed redundant 'else' in acpi_ost_status_code(). (Andy Shevchenko)
v2:
Do not overwrite ost code in acpi_generic_hotplug_event(). Move
the "error code to ost code" logic to a help function. (Andy Shevchenko)
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: "Lee, Chun-Yi" <jlee@suse.com>
---
drivers/acpi/scan.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
index 3a10d7573477..41f5065190c7 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@ -384,6 +384,20 @@ static int acpi_generic_hotplug_event(struct acpi_device *adev, u32 type)
return -EINVAL;
}
+static int acpi_ost_status_code(u32 src, int error)
+{
+ switch (src) {
+ case ACPI_NOTIFY_EJECT_REQUEST:
+ case ACPI_OST_EC_OSPM_EJECT:
+ if (error == -EPERM)
+ return ACPI_OST_SC_EJECT_NOT_SUPPORTED;
+ if (error == -EBUSY)
+ return ACPI_OST_SC_DEVICE_BUSY;
+ break;
+ }
+ return error ? ACPI_OST_SC_NON_SPECIFIC_FAILURE : ACPI_OST_SC_SUCCESS;
+}
+
void acpi_device_hotplug(struct acpi_device *adev, u32 src)
{
u32 ost_code = ACPI_OST_SC_NON_SPECIFIC_FAILURE;
@@ -404,10 +418,6 @@ void acpi_device_hotplug(struct acpi_device *adev, u32 src)
error = dock_notify(adev, src);
} else if (adev->flags.hotplug_notify) {
error = acpi_generic_hotplug_event(adev, src);
- if (error == -EPERM) {
- ost_code = ACPI_OST_SC_EJECT_NOT_SUPPORTED;
- goto err_out;
- }
} else {
int (*notify)(struct acpi_device *, u32);
@@ -423,9 +433,8 @@ void acpi_device_hotplug(struct acpi_device *adev, u32 src)
else
goto out;
}
- if (!error)
- ost_code = ACPI_OST_SC_SUCCESS;
+ ost_code = acpi_ost_status_code(src, error);
err_out:
acpi_evaluate_ost(adev->handle, src, ost_code, NULL);
--
2.12.0
next reply other threads:[~2017-06-13 11:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-13 11:18 Lee, Chun-Yi [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-06-21 7:45 [RFC PATCH v3] acpi: indicate to platform when hot remove returns busy Lee, Chun-Yi
2017-06-28 22:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-06-30 5:49 ` joeyli
2017-07-03 9:34 ` joeyli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170613111837.14170-1-jlee@suse.com \
--to=joeyli.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=jlee@suse.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).