From: joeyli <jlee@suse.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: "Lee, Chun-Yi" <joeyli.kernel@gmail.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3] acpi: indicate to platform when hot remove returns busy
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2017 17:34:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170703093452.GC16862@linux-l9pv.suse> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170630054907.GB13714@linux-l9pv.suse>
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 01:49:07PM +0800, joeyli wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 12:13:18AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Wednesday, June 21, 2017 03:45:44 PM Lee, Chun-Yi wrote:
> > > In hotplug logic, it always indicates non-specific failure to
> > > platform through _OST when handing acpi hot-remove event failed. Then
> > > platform terminates the hot-remove process but it can not identify
> > > the reason.
> > >
[...snip]
> > >
> > > @@ -423,9 +433,8 @@ void acpi_device_hotplug(struct acpi_device *adev, u32 src)
> > > else
> > > goto out;
> > > }
> > > - if (!error)
> > > - ost_code = ACPI_OST_SC_SUCCESS;
> >
> > I just would do:
> >
> > switch (error) {
> > case 0:
> > ost_code = ACPI_OST_SC_SUCCESS;
> > break;
> > case -EBUSY:
> > ost_code = ACPI_OST_SC_DEVICE_BUSY;
> > break;
> > default:
> > ost_code = ACPI_OST_SC_NON_SPECIFIC_FAILURE;
> > break;
> > }
> >
>
> Currently the above switch-case works. But if considering
> ACPI_OST_EC_OSPM_INSERTION in the future then it's not enough.
>
After more consideration...
Because Andy and Rafael gave the same suggestion and we didn't
see INSERTION event yet. I will follow the suggestion to send
v4 patch.
Thanks a lot!
Joey Lee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-03 9:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-21 7:45 [RFC PATCH v3] acpi: indicate to platform when hot remove returns busy Lee, Chun-Yi
2017-06-28 22:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-06-30 5:49 ` joeyli
2017-07-03 9:34 ` joeyli [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-06-13 11:18 Lee, Chun-Yi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170703093452.GC16862@linux-l9pv.suse \
--to=jlee@suse.com \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=joeyli.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).