From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
To: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi: Fix proper return code for function acpi_gsi_to_irq
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 18:46:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170711174636.GA31526@red-moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170711164543.23439-1-msalter@redhat.com>
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 12:45:43PM -0400, Mark Salter wrote:
> The function acpi_gsi_to_irq must return 0 on success as the caller
> ghes_probe expects an 0 for success. This change also matches x86
> implementation.
>
> This patch was submitted around 4.5 timeframe but wasn't pushed because
> it didn't fix a real problem. Now that RAS/GHES patches are in kernel,
> this fixes an error seen on a Mustang (arm64) platform:
Nit: I think you can rephrase the log, ie it is a bug and you are fixing
it, that's it.
> GHES: Failed to map GSI to IRQ for generic hardware error source: 2
> GHES: probe of GHES.2 failed with error 81
>
> Signed-off-by: Tuan Phan <tphan@apm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Loc Ho <lho@apm.com>
> [rebased to v4.12-rc]
> Signed-off-by: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/irq.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/irq.c b/drivers/acpi/irq.c
> index 830299a..7c352cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/irq.c
> @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ static struct fwnode_handle *acpi_gsi_domain_id;
> *
> * irq location updated with irq value [>0 on success, 0 on failure]
> *
> - * Returns: linux IRQ number on success (>0)
> + * Returns: 0 on success
> * -EINVAL on failure
> */
> int acpi_gsi_to_irq(u32 gsi, unsigned int *irq)
> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ int acpi_gsi_to_irq(u32 gsi, unsigned int *irq)
> * *irq == 0 means no mapping, that should
> * be reported as a failure
> */
> - return (*irq > 0) ? *irq : -EINVAL;
> + return (*irq > 0) ? 0 : -EINVAL;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_gsi_to_irq);
>
> --
> 2.9.4
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-11 17:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-11 16:45 [PATCH] acpi: Fix proper return code for function acpi_gsi_to_irq Mark Salter
2017-07-11 17:23 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-07-11 17:46 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
2017-07-12 21:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170711174636.GA31526@red-moon \
--to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=msalter@redhat.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox