public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
To: "Baicar, Tyler" <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
	rjw@rjwysocki.net, lenb@kernel.org, will.deacon@arm.com,
	james.morse@arm.com, shiju.jose@huawei.com,
	geliangtang@gmail.com, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi: apei: clear error status before acknowledging the error
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 10:00:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170731170017.2vwxhewivgpyvpea@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fd826be1-50b0-1f82-3fb3-a32a356c45c4@codeaurora.org>

On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 10:15:27AM -0600, Baicar, Tyler wrote:
> I think the better thing to do in this case is still send the ack. If
> ghes_read_estatus() fails, then
> either we are unable to read the estatus or the estatus is empty/invalid.

Right now we silently handle that failure of ghes_read_estatus(). That
might be hiding some Linux bugs if we are calling ghes_proc() in cases
where we shouldn't.

Perhaps we should have something like this, so if systems do start acting
weirdly there will be a note that we took this path:

	rc = ghes_read_estatus(ghes, 0);
	if (rc) {
		pr_notice("surprise failure reading ghes estatus\n");
		goto out;
	}


> If we do not send the ack, then we will be in a scenario where FW will not
> send any more errors.

We might ACK something that the firmware didn't send, which may
lead to other problems.

> I think it would be better to still have the FW send the errors and kernel
> complain about issues with

But I agree with this. We should send the ACK.  Luckliy this doesn't have
a long legacy problem because the whole ACK mechanism is a new thing. So
we only have to worry about GHESv2 supporting BIOS.

-Tony

  reply	other threads:[~2017-07-31 17:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-28 22:25 [PATCH] acpi: apei: clear error status before acknowledging the error Tyler Baicar
2017-07-29  6:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-07-31 16:15   ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-07-31 17:00     ` Luck, Tony [this message]
2017-07-31 17:44       ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-08-03 22:06         ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-07-31 17:11     ` James Morse
2017-07-31 17:57       ` Baicar, Tyler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170731170017.2vwxhewivgpyvpea@intel.com \
    --to=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=geliangtang@gmail.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=shiju.jose@huawei.com \
    --cc=tbaicar@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox