From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
Guodong Xu <guodong.xu@linaro.org>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@linaro.org>,
Johannes Stezenbach <js@sig21.net>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFT][PATCH v2 2/2] PM / i2c: designware: Clean up system sleep handling without ACPI
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2017 18:24:58 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170905152458.GB2477@lahna.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3495106.6fP2YzlEUn@aspire.rjw.lan>
On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 05:04:21PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 5, 2017 5:07:44 PM CEST Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 04:55:44PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, September 5, 2017 4:58:35 PM CEST Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 04:46:11PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > On Tuesday, September 5, 2017 4:45:11 PM CEST Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > > > > > On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 12:01:54PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > > > static const struct dev_pm_ops dw_i2c_dev_pm_ops = {
> > > > > > > - .prepare = dw_i2c_plat_prepare,
> > > > > > > - .complete = dw_i2c_plat_complete,
> > > > > > > - SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(dw_i2c_plat_suspend, dw_i2c_plat_resume)
> > > > > > > - SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(dw_i2c_plat_runtime_suspend,
> > > > > > > - dw_i2c_plat_resume,
> > > > > > > - NULL)
> > > > > > > + SET_LATE_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(dw_i2c_plat_suspend, dw_i2c_plat_resume)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This seems to cause problem with intel-lpss MFD driver because it uses
> > > > > > .suspend() and .resume() instead of .suspend_late() and .resume_early().
> > > > >
> > > > > OK, so there is one more dependency here.
> > > > >
> > > > > Can you please point me to this code?
> > > >
> > > > It is in drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.c. See intel_lpss_resume().
> > > >
> > >
> > > Looking at it, but I don't quite see how this is related to the
> > > i2c-designware-platedv suspend/resume ...
> >
> > intel-lpss is the parent device for i2c-designware-platdrv. It is
> > supposed to handle all LPSS specific stuff, like bringing the PCI device
> > out of reset before the i2c-designware-platdrv does its own resume
> > things.
>
> Yes, I see.
>
> OK, so what about moving its suspend/resume to the late/early stages?
>
> Would the parent of it be confused?
It seems to work. I did following change and now suspend/resume works
fine with your patch series.
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.h b/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.h
index 694116630ffa..c987f7fe6c74 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.h
+++ b/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.h
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ int intel_lpss_resume(struct device *dev);
#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
#define INTEL_LPSS_SLEEP_PM_OPS \
.prepare = intel_lpss_prepare, \
- .suspend = intel_lpss_suspend, \
- .resume = intel_lpss_resume, \
+ .suspend_late = intel_lpss_suspend, \
+ .resume_early = intel_lpss_resume, \
.freeze = intel_lpss_suspend, \
.thaw = intel_lpss_resume, \
.poweroff = intel_lpss_suspend, \
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-05 15:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-03 23:05 [RFT][PATCH 0/2] i2c: designware: Runtime PM aware system sleep handling Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-09-03 23:08 ` [RFT][PATCH 1/2] i2c: designware: Clean up PM handling in dw_i2c_plat_probe() Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-09-05 14:40 ` Jarkko Nikula
2017-09-05 14:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-09-03 23:14 ` [RFT][PATCH 2/2] PM / i2c: designware: Clean up system sleep handling without ACPI Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-09-04 10:01 ` [RFT][PATCH v2 " Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-09-05 14:45 ` Mika Westerberg
2017-09-05 14:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-09-05 14:58 ` Mika Westerberg
2017-09-05 14:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-09-05 15:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-09-05 15:07 ` Mika Westerberg
2017-09-05 15:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-09-05 15:24 ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
2017-09-05 15:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-09-05 15:41 ` Mika Westerberg
2017-09-05 21:00 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2017-09-05 21:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-09-04 10:07 ` [RFT][PATCH " Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-09-05 15:46 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-09-05 23:41 ` [RFT][PATCH v3 0/3] i2c: designware: Runtime PM aware system sleep handling Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-09-05 23:43 ` [RFT][PATCH v3 1/3] i2c: designware: Clean up PM handling in dw_i2c_plat_probe() Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-09-05 23:46 ` [RFT][PATCH v3 2/3] PM / mfd: intel-lpss: Push system sleep callbacks to late/early stages Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-09-05 23:48 ` [RFT][PATCH v3 3/3] PM / i2c: designware: Clean up system sleep handling Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-09-06 9:16 ` [RFT][PATCH v3 0/3] i2c: designware: Runtime PM aware " Johannes Stezenbach
2017-09-06 9:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-09-06 19:59 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2017-09-06 21:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-09-08 7:34 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2017-09-06 11:06 ` Mika Westerberg
2017-09-06 11:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-09-06 13:46 ` Jarkko Nikula
2017-09-24 23:13 ` [PATCH v4 " Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-09-24 23:17 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] PM: i2c-designware-platdrv: Clean up PM handling in probe Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-09-25 19:12 ` Ulf Hansson
2017-09-25 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-09-25 21:10 ` [Update][PATCH v5 " Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-10-05 11:00 ` Wolfram Sang
2017-09-24 23:20 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] PM / mfd: intel-lpss: Push system sleep callbacks to late/early stages Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-09-25 7:28 ` Wolfram Sang
2017-09-25 12:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-09-25 14:24 ` Wolfram Sang
2017-10-02 23:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-09-28 19:19 ` Lee Jones
2017-09-28 20:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-10-05 11:00 ` Wolfram Sang
2017-09-24 23:30 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] PM: i2c-designware-platdrv: Suspend/resume at the " Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-10-05 11:00 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170905152458.GB2477@lahna.fi.intel.com \
--to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=guodong.xu@linaro.org \
--cc=haojian.zhuang@linaro.org \
--cc=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=js@sig21.net \
--cc=jszhang@marvell.com \
--cc=khilman@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox