From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
x86@kernel.org, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, hpa@zytor.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, corbet@lwn.net,
rjw@rjwysocki.net, lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] x86/boot: add acpi rsdp address to setup_header
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 09:48:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171208084827.yv3vrtfnn6otjdg4@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <81777128-a277-c47b-2570-a330b2f6c50d@suse.com>
* Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> wrote:
> >> +Offset/size: 0x268/8
> >> +Protocol: 2.14+
> >> +
> >> + This field can be set by the boot loader to tell the kernel the
> >> + physical address of the ACPI RSDP table.
> >> +
> >> + A value of 0 indicates the kernel should fall back to the standard
> >> + methods to locate the RSDP (search in EBDA/low memory).
> >
> > That's not the only method used: the ACPI RSDP address can also be discovered via
> > efi.rsdp20 and efi.rsdp, both of which appear to be 32-bit values.
>
> Sure, but this is valid for booting via EFI only.
Yeah, so what I tried to say is that the description as written is not fully
correct and triggered my pedantry:
+ A value of 0 indicates the kernel should fall back to the standard
+ methods to locate the RSDP (search in EBDA/low memory).
To make it correct we need to either write less:
+ A value of 0 indicates the kernel should fall back to the standard
+ methods to locate the RSDP.
or write more and make it open ended so it doesn't have to be extended with every
method of getting the RSDP that might be added in the future:
+ A value of 0 indicates the kernel should fall back to the standard
+ methods to locate the RSDP (search in EBDA/low memory, get it from
+ EFI if present, etc.).
... or so?
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-08 8:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-07 12:28 [PATCH v2 0/3] x86: make rsdp address accessible via boot params Juergen Gross
2017-12-07 12:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] x86/boot: add acpi rsdp address to setup_header Juergen Gross
2017-12-08 7:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-12-08 8:28 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2017-12-08 8:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-12-08 8:36 ` Juergen Gross
2017-12-08 8:48 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2017-12-08 8:52 ` Juergen Gross
2017-12-07 12:28 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] x86/acpi: take rsdp address for boot params if available Juergen Gross
2017-12-08 7:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-12-08 8:26 ` Juergen Gross
2017-12-08 11:14 ` Juergen Gross
2017-12-08 11:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-12-08 11:51 ` Juergen Gross
2017-12-07 12:28 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] x86/xen: supply rsdp address in boot params for pvh guests Juergen Gross
2017-12-08 7:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-12-08 8:40 ` Juergen Gross
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171208084827.yv3vrtfnn6otjdg4@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox