From: Vadim Lomovtsev <Vadim.Lomovtsev@caviumnetworks.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: "Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@intel.com>,
"Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
"lenb@kernel.org" <lenb@kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"devel@acpica.org" <devel@acpica.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"vadim.lomovtsev@cavium.com" <vadim.lomovtsev@cavium.com>,
"Schmauss, Erik" <erik.schmauss@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi: acpica: add acpi status check prior walking through namespace
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 01:36:00 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171214093600.GB10734@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0iTzJ-=8SWcS6Hu1rP4d-EeOHz2yDjTPMAq8BdW8smSPg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 05:48:49PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Vadim Lomovtsev
> <Vadim.Lomovtsev@caviumnetworks.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 09:52:21PM +0000, Moore, Robert wrote:
> >> Another way to look at this is that the kernel should not be calling ACPI interfaces if ACPI is disabled.
> >
> > Yes, I agree. So in this case the ltp_acpi test case has to be updated with such checking
> > before calling ACPI interfaces. However, it seems that such calls was put there intentionally,
> > without ACPI state check, as part of kernel testing strategy.
>
> Not really.
Ok, see your point.
Thank you for your time.
WBR,
Vadim
>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-14 9:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-12 15:59 [BUG] acpica: ltp_acpi test case causes kernel crash at acpi_ns_walk_namespace Vadim Lomovtsev
2017-12-12 15:59 ` [PATCH] acpi: acpica: add acpi status check prior walking through namespace Vadim Lomovtsev
2017-12-12 21:52 ` Moore, Robert
2017-12-13 14:52 ` Vadim Lomovtsev
2017-12-13 16:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-14 9:36 ` Vadim Lomovtsev [this message]
2017-12-12 23:45 ` [BUG] acpica: ltp_acpi test case causes kernel crash at acpi_ns_walk_namespace Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-13 14:55 ` Vadim Lomovtsev
2017-12-13 16:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-14 9:34 ` Vadim Lomovtsev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171214093600.GB10734@localhost.localdomain \
--to=vadim.lomovtsev@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=devel@acpica.org \
--cc=erik.schmauss@intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
--cc=vadim.lomovtsev@cavium.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox