From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] acpi: apei: Rename ghes_severity() to ghes_cper_severity() Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 15:50:15 +0200 Message-ID: <20180522135015.GF5512@pd.tnic> References: <20180521135003.32459-1-mr.nuke.me@gmail.com> <20180521135003.32459-2-mr.nuke.me@gmail.com> <53d0ba88-6929-a7cf-6c3e-4ca389f7249a@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <53d0ba88-6929-a7cf-6c3e-4ca389f7249a@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Alex G." Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , alex_gagniuc@dellteam.com, austin_bolen@dell.com, shyam_iyer@dell.com, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , Tony Luck , Tyler Baicar , Will Deacon , James Morse , Shiju Jose , "Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang" , Dongjiu Geng , ACPI Devel Maling List , Linux Kernel Mailing List List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 08:38:39AM -0500, Alex G. wrote: > > It looks like the *real* reason for this change is that you > > re-introduce ghes_severity() as a different function in the second > > patch. > > /me holds fist at Borislav That was a misunderstanding with Rafael and me - we fixed it on IRC. But this is not the real problem with your approach - it is the marking of all PCIe errors as recoverable, regardless of the signature. That's a no-no, IMO. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.